AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

Development of an integrated heat strain index for personalized assessment and forecasting

Yudong Mao1, Peng Zhang1, Jun Liu2, Jingyue Zhang3, Xiwen Feng1, Xiaofeng Liang1, Zhaosong Fang1( )
School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China
Key Laboratory of Coal Resources Exploration and Comprehensive Utilization, Ministry of Natural Resources, Shaanxi Coal Geology Group Company Limited, Xi’an, China
Shaanxi Coal Geology Investigation Research Institute Co., Ltd., Xi’an, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Occupational heat stress threatens worker health and productivity under climate warming, yet common environmental indices cannot fully represent person-specific physiological and perceptual strain. This study developed an integrated heat strain index (IHSI) using high-resolution data from 71 young male participants exposed to nine controlled temperature-speed conditions in an environmental chamber. Environmental, physiological, subjective, and individual variables were integrated through logistic-regression-based scoring, and participant-level validation was used to reduce information leakage from repeated time-series measurements. Results show significant phase-dependent physiological and perceptual changes (p < 0.001). Mean skin temperature continues to rise during recovery, reaching 37.02 ± 0.62 ℃, while subjective discomfort partly decreases, indicating a potential blind spot in self-perception. Partial pressure of end tidal carbon dioxide decreases from 4.45 kPa during preparation to 3.66 kPa during recovery, suggesting that respiratory responses provide additional information beyond thermal and cardiovascular indicators. The IHSI achieves AUC (area under the curve) = 0.8872, average precision = 0.9499, and overall accuracy = 80.6% in participant-level validation. For one-minute-ahead forecasting, CNN-GRU (convolutional neural networks-gated recurrent units) is identified as the best model according to validation-set RMSE, achieving R2 = 0.8808, RMSE = 4.9040, and MAPE = 10.5980% using only heat index, heart rate, age, and body mass index. These findings support the feasibility of a continuous, interpretable, and non-invasive framework for individualized heat-strain monitoring and short-term occupational warning.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
bs-19-9-2323_ESM.pdf (86.6 KB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Building Simulation
Pages 2323-2347

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Mao Y, Zhang P, Liu J, et al. Development of an integrated heat strain index for personalized assessment and forecasting. Building Simulation, 2026, 19(9): 2323-2347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-026-1492-2

6

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 07 April 2026
Revised: 30 June 2026
Accepted: 26 July 2026
Published: 02 October 2026
© Tsinghua University Press 2026