AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (6.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

A comprehensive evaluation of ventilation performance in urban buildings with different opening configurations

Wan Hazwatiamani Wan Ismail1Mohd Faizal Mohamad1,2( )Naoki Ikegaya3Jaeyong Chung4Chiyoko Hirose5Azli Abd Razak1
Wind Engineering & Building Physics (WEBP), Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, 40450, Malaysia
Smart Manufacturing Research Institute (SMRI), Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, 40450, Malaysia
Faculty of Engineering Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 816-8580, Japan
SOH Wind Engineering LLC, Jalan Binjai, Kuala Lumpur, 50450, Malaysia
Fukuoka Institute of Health and Environmental Sciences, Fukuoka, 818-0135, Japan
Show Author Information

Abstract

The efficiency of natural ventilation in cross-ventilated buildings is significantly influenced by the positioning of openings. In sheltered conditions, where building configurations generate complex flow interactions, indoor air distribution and ventilation efficiency can be substantially impacted. This study investigates the influence of various opening positions on ventilation performance in two representative urban layouts: square (SQ) and staggered (ST) building arrays. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed using the renormalization group k-ε (RNG) closure model. The evaluation of ventilation performance is conducted by three principal indices: ventilation rate, age of air, and air exchange efficiency, enabling a comprehensive assessment of indoor air quality. The results indicate that both ventilation rate and air exchange efficiency are significantly influenced by the combination between opening locations and array configurations. In both array layouts, positioning openings at elevated positions on the windward and leeward facades consistently improves the dimensionless ventilation rate by 2 to 3 times compared to other opening arrangements. A similar trend is observed in air exchange efficiency, attaining 61% for SQ array and 73% for ST array. This is attributed to a deeper penetration of air into the building envelope and enhanced internal mixing prior to leaving the area. Furthermore, under SQ array, placement of both openings in the lowest region of the facades should be avoided as it leads to poor ventilation rate and decreased air exchange efficiency. These findings highlight the importance of openings position in optimizing natural ventilation strategies for buildings situated in sheltered urban environments.

Graphical Abstract

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
bs-19-6-1523_ESM.pdf (1.1 MB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Building Simulation
Pages 1523-1543

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Ismail WHW, Mohamad MF, Ikegaya N, et al. A comprehensive evaluation of ventilation performance in urban buildings with different opening configurations. Building Simulation, 2026, 19(6): 1523-1543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-026-1429-9

3

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 16 July 2025
Revised: 03 February 2026
Accepted: 09 February 2026
Published: 16 July 2026
© Author(s) 2026

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/