AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Weather files for building simulation in Brazil: A national benchmark

Mario Alves da Silva1,2( )Giovanni Pernigotto1Alessandro Prada3Andrea Gasparella1Joyce Correna Carlo2
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, NOI Techpark - via Bruno Buozzi 1, 39100, Bolzano, Italy
Federal University of Viçosa, avenue PH Rolfs, 36570-900 Viçosa, Brazil
University of Trento, Via Mesiano 77, 38123, Trento, Italy
Show Author Information

Abstract

Weather files strongly influence building performance simulation, especially in climatically diverse countries such as Brazil. Yet, the representativeness of typical meteorological years (TMY) for Brazilian applications remains insufficiently assessed. This study aims to evaluate four established TMY approaches and to introduce a performance-based alternative (Brazilian typical meteorological year, BTMY) that incorporates building-specific climatic sensitivity. Using ERA5-Land data for 480 locations, we compiled 15 actual meteorological years (2008–2022) per site and assessed their impact on operative temperature and energy needs in representative residential models. Spearman filtering removed collinear meteorological parameters, and optimized XGBoost and ε-SVR models predicted daily operative temperature with R2 = 0.91 ± 0.03 (RMSE = 0.64 ± 0.19 ℃) and daily energy needs with R2 = 0.87 ± 0.05 (RMSE = 0.05 ± 0.01 kWh m−2 yr−1), identifying dry-bulb temperature as the dominant meteorological parameter (75% importance for operative temperature; 59% for energy needs). Against 15-year simulations, minimum Finkelstein–Schafer and Best Rank Ⅰ achieved the lowest mean operative-temperature bias (0.15 ℃, SD 0.09–0.10 ℃), ISO was similar (0.16 ± 0.13 ℃), while Pissimanis performed worst (0.23 ± 0.27 ℃). BTMY weather files matched the TMY methods and clarified key climatic drivers. Results showed that ERA5-Land data source mattered more than the reference-year method. Finally, the study delivered more than 3000 new weather files to support simulation practice and policy development.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
bs-19-3-619_ESM.xlsx (239.8 KB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Building Simulation
Pages 619-638

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
da Silva MA, Pernigotto G, Prada A, et al. Weather files for building simulation in Brazil: A national benchmark. Building Simulation, 2026, 19(3): 619-638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-026-1416-1

24

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 05 September 2025
Revised: 08 January 2026
Accepted: 14 January 2026
Published: 28 April 2026
© Author(s) 2026

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/