AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

A comprehensive framework for building flexibility assessment: RC-Mapping modeling, flexibility quantification, and uncertainty analysis

Huilong Wang1Xiyin Weng1Yongjun Sun2( )Pengyuan Shen3( )
State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Geotechnics and Tunnelling (Shenzhen University), Shenzhen 518060, China
Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Institute of Future Human Habitats, Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

The increasing integration of renewable energy sources highlights the urgent need for grid flexibility, with buildings serving as key controllable loads. In this context, accurately quantifying building flexibility is essential for enabling effective demand-side management and ensuring reliable grid operations. However, several challenges hinder this quantification. To address these issues, this study proposes a comprehensive flexibility quantification framework. First, a novel RC-Mapping model incorporating an Enumerate-Comparison Method is proposed. The RC-Mapping model can capture the thermal behavior of both the building and the air conditioning system, while the Enumerate-Comparison Method can initialize state parameters in the RC-Mapping model. Compared with the conventional approach, as validated by the experiment, the proposed method can substantially improve RMSE for indoor temperature prediction from 0.542 ℃ to 0.266 ℃, and the MAPE for flexibility quantification from 27.58% to 10.98%. Second, the study introduces the power reduction-duration curve and temperature variation curves to characterize flexibility from both grid and building perspectives. Specifically, based on the analysis of the power reduction-duration curve, this study provides a systematic analysis of four sources of flexibility and their underlying mechanisms, including the thermal storage of the building, the thermal storage of the HVAC system, the increase of coefficient of performance (COP), and the reduction in cooling load. Finally, the study investigates the impact of uncertainties in COP and internal heat gains on flexibility quantification. According to the result, it is recommended to slightly underestimate the COP and overestimate the internal heat gain schedule to improve the accuracy of flexibility quantification.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Building Simulation
Pages 2945-2962

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Wang H, Weng X, Sun Y, et al. A comprehensive framework for building flexibility assessment: RC-Mapping modeling, flexibility quantification, and uncertainty analysis. Building Simulation, 2025, 18(11): 2945-2962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-025-1348-1

696

Views

101

Downloads

1

Crossref

0

Web of Science

1

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 27 June 2025
Revised: 27 July 2025
Accepted: 08 August 2025
Published: 15 September 2025
© The Author(s) 2025

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/