Journal Home > Volume 16 , Issue 6
Building Simulation 2023, 16(6): 1013-1026 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-023-1015-3
Research Article | Issue | Published: 26 March 2023

A global typical meteorological year (TMY) database on ERA5 dataset

Show Author's Information Yi Wu1,  Jingjing An2,  Chenxi Gui1,  Chan Xiao3,  Da Yan1( )
Building Energy Research Center, School of Architecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China
National Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing, China
Keywords:
building simulation, typical meteorological year, atmospheric reanalysis data, ERA5
Cite this article:
Wu Y, An J, Gui C, et al. A global typical meteorological year (TMY) database on ERA5 dataset. Building Simulation, 2023, 16(6): 1013-1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-023-1015-3
Download citation
EndNote(RIS)
BibTeX

431

Views

27

Downloads

Citations

7

Crossref

5

WoS

7

Scopus

0

CSCD

Abstract Full text About this article

The outdoor climate condition is one of the deterministic factors influencing building energy consumption. Building performance simulation (BPS) tools usually adopt typical meteorological year (TMY) as the outdoor climate input. Despite that many scholars and institutes have developed TMY datasets, these datasets are usually based on distinct data sources and methods. Considering the increase of international cooperation construction projects, compatible TMY dataset for different countries is in urgent need. This paper presents a global typical meteorological year (TMY) database covering 38,947 stations worldwide based on the fifth-generation atmospheric reanalysis product released by the European Center (ERA5). The data is created with Chinese Standard Weather Database (CSWD) method to reflect the average level of historical weather. The dataset is saved in a 55 GB database of compressed CSV files and a website is established where users can download their required TMY data for certain cities according to the longitude and latitude information. A systematic validation is conducted to confirm the feasibility of ERA5 as data source and validity of generated TMY data. This TMY-ERA5 dataset is fundamental and essential in building system designs of international construction projects, building performance simulation, especially for some countries lacking ground meteorological stations or missing meteorological year data in the building sector. It can be used as references for other meteorological climate studies.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

A global typical meteorological year (TMY) database on ERA5 dataset

Show Author's information Yi Wu1, Jingjing An2, Chenxi Gui1, Chan Xiao3, Da Yan1( )
Building Energy Research Center, School of Architecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China
National Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing, China

Abstract

The outdoor climate condition is one of the deterministic factors influencing building energy consumption. Building performance simulation (BPS) tools usually adopt typical meteorological year (TMY) as the outdoor climate input. Despite that many scholars and institutes have developed TMY datasets, these datasets are usually based on distinct data sources and methods. Considering the increase of international cooperation construction projects, compatible TMY dataset for different countries is in urgent need. This paper presents a global typical meteorological year (TMY) database covering 38,947 stations worldwide based on the fifth-generation atmospheric reanalysis product released by the European Center (ERA5). The data is created with Chinese Standard Weather Database (CSWD) method to reflect the average level of historical weather. The dataset is saved in a 55 GB database of compressed CSV files and a website is established where users can download their required TMY data for certain cities according to the longitude and latitude information. A systematic validation is conducted to confirm the feasibility of ERA5 as data source and validity of generated TMY data. This TMY-ERA5 dataset is fundamental and essential in building system designs of international construction projects, building performance simulation, especially for some countries lacking ground meteorological stations or missing meteorological year data in the building sector. It can be used as references for other meteorological climate studies.

Keywords: building simulation, typical meteorological year, atmospheric reanalysis data, ERA5

References(57)

Abatzoglou JT (2013). Development of gridded surface meteorological data for ecological applications and modelling. International Journal of Climatology, 33: 121–131.
DOI Google Scholar

Berardi U, Jafarpur P (2020). Assessing the impact of climate change on building heating and cooling energy demand in Canada. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 121: 109681.
DOI Google Scholar

Bhatnagar M, Mathur J, Garg V (2018). Determining base temperature for heating and cooling degree-days for India. Journal of Building Engineering, 18: 270–280.
DOI Google Scholar

Bonavita M, Hólm E, Isaksen L, et al. (2016). The evolution of the ECMWF hybrid data assimilation system. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 142: 287–303.
DOI Google Scholar

Chan ALS, Chow TT, Fong SKF, et al. (2006). Generation of a typical meteorological year for Hong Kong. Energy Conversion and Management, 47: 87–96.
DOI Google Scholar

Chen Z, Yu B, Li Y, et al. (2022). Assessing the potential and utilization of solar energy at the building-scale in Shanghai. Sustainable Cities and Society, 82: 103917.
DOI Google Scholar

CIBSE T (2006). Degree-days: Theory and application. London: The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers.
Google Scholar

Crawley D, Pedersen C, Lawrie L, et al. (2000). EnergyPlus: energy simulation program. Ashrae Journal, 42: 49–56.
Google Scholar

Cui Y, Yan D, Hong T, et al. (2017). Comparison of typical year and multiyear building simulations using a 55-year actual weather data set from China. Applied Energy, 195: 890–904.
DOI Google Scholar

Dong B, Widjaja R, Wu W, et al. (2021). Review of onsite temperature and solar forecasting models to enable better building design and operations. Building Simulation, 14: 885–907.
DOI Google Scholar
Elangovan R, Kumar A, Alur R (2017). Thermal performance of building envelops. In: Abraham MA (ed), Encyclopedia of Sustainable Technologies. Oxford: Elsevier. pp. 169–188.
DOI

Festa R, Ratto CF (1993). Proposal of a numerical procedure to select Reference Years. Solar Energy, 50: 9–17.
DOI Google Scholar

Finkelstein JM, Schafer RE (1971). Improved goodness-of-fit tests. Biometrika, 58: 641–645.
DOI Google Scholar

Gelaro R, McCarty W, Suárez MJ, et al. (2017). The modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications, version 2 (MERRA-2). Journal of Climate, 30: 5419–5454.
DOI Google Scholar

Gil Ruiz SA, Barriga JEC, Martínez JA (2021). Wind power assessment in the Caribbean region of Colombia, using ten-minute wind observations and ERA5 data. Renewable Energy, 172: 158–176.
DOI Google Scholar

Gualtieri G (2021). Reliability of ERA5 reanalysis data for wind resource assessment: A comparison against tall towers. Energies, 14: 4169.
DOI Google Scholar

Hall IJ, Prairie RR, Anderson HE, et al. (1978). Generation of typical reference years for 26 SOLMET stations. Saudia Laboratories Report SAND, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Google Scholar

Haq EU, Lyu X, Jia Y, et al. (2020). Forecasting household electric appliances consumption and peak demand based on hybrid machine learning approach. Energy Reports, 6: 1099–1105.
DOI Google Scholar

Harada Y, Kamahori H, Kobayashi C, et al. (2016). The JRA-55 reanalysis: Representation of atmospheric circulation and climate variability. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan Ser Ⅱ, 94: 269–302.
DOI Google Scholar
He X (2020). DataHub, OpenGMS, China Meteorological Data Service Centre. Available at https://geomodeling.njnu.edu.cn/dataHub/f27d3edc-b6af-4d00-a7c3-5f58331ee116.

Herrera M, Natarajan S, Coley DA, et al. (2017). A review of current and future weather data for building simulation. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 38: 602–627.
DOI Google Scholar

Hersbach H, Bell B, Berrisford P, et al. (2020). The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 146: 1999–2049.
DOI Google Scholar
Huang YJ, Crawley DB (1996). Does it Matter Which Weather Data You Use in Energy Simulations? In: Proceedings of 1996 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Pacific Grove, CA, USA.

Huang YJ, Su FP, Seo DP, et al. (2014). Development of 3012 IWEC2 weather files for international locations (RP-1477). ASHRAE Transactions, 120(1): 340–355.
Google Scholar

Hu S, Zhang Y, Yang Z, et al. (2022). Challenges and opportunities for carbon neutrality in China’s building sector—Modelling and data. Building Simulation, 15: 1899–1921.
DOI Google Scholar

Huo X, Yang L, Li DHW, et al. (2022). Impact of climate change on outdoor design conditions and implications to peak loads. Building Simulation, 15: 2051–2065.
DOI Google Scholar

IEA (2019). World Energy Balances 2019. International Energy Agency.
Google Scholar

Isaac M, van Vuuren DP (2009). Modeling global residential sector energy demand for heating and air conditioning in the context of climate change. Energy Policy, 37: 507–521.
DOI Google Scholar

Jiang Q, Li W, Fan Z, et al. (2021). Evaluation of the ERA5 reanalysis precipitation dataset over Chinese mainland. Journal of Hydrology, 595: 125660.
DOI Google Scholar

Jiao D, Xu N, Yang F, et al. (2021). Evaluation of spatial-temporal variation performance of ERA5 precipitation data in China. Scientific Reports, 11: 17956.
DOI Google Scholar

Kalogirou SA (2003). Generation of typical meteorological year (TMY-2) for Nicosia, Cyprus. Renewable Energy, 28: 2317–2334.
DOI Google Scholar
Kalogirou SA (2012). Solar thermal systems. In: Sayigh A (ed), Comprehensive Renewable Energy. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
DOI
Lawrimore J, Menne M, Gleason B, et al. (2011). Global Historical Climatology Network - Monthly (GHCN-M), Version 3. In: Information. NNCfE (ed).

McKinley S, Levine M (1998). Cubic spline interpolation. College of the Redwoods, 45: 1049–1060.
Google Scholar
Myers DR (2012). Solar radiation resource assessment for renewable energy conversion. In: Sayigh A (ed), Comprehensive Renewable Energy. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
DOI

Neto AH, Durante LC, Callejas IJA, et al. (2022). The challenges on operating a zero net energy building facing global warming conditions. Building Simulation, 15: 435–451.
DOI Google Scholar

NCD (1981). Typical Meteorological Year User’s Manual (TD-9734) Hourly Solar Radiation—Surface Meteorological Observations. NCDC Asheville, NC, USA.
Google Scholar

Petri Y, Caldeira K (2015). Impacts of global warming on residential heating and cooling degree-days in the United States. Scientific Reports, 5: 12427.
DOI Google Scholar

Rahman IA, Dewsbury J (2007). Selection of typical weather data (test reference years) for Subang, Malaysia. Building and Environment, 42: 3636–3641.
DOI Google Scholar

Ren Z, Tang Z, James M (2021). Typical meteorological year weather files User Guide. Australia’s National Science Agency.
Google Scholar

Rienecker MM, Suarez MJ, Gelaro R, et al. (2011). MERRA: NASA’s modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications. Journal of Climate, 24: 3624–3648.
DOI Google Scholar

Sivak M (2008). Where to live in the United States: combined energy demand for heating and cooling in the 50 largest metropolitan areas. Cities, 25: 396–398.
DOI Google Scholar

Skeiker K, Ghani BA (2009). A software tool for the creation of a typical meteorological year. Renewable Energy, 34: 544–554.
DOI Google Scholar
Song F, Zhu Q, Wu R, et al. (2007). Meteorological data set for building thermal environment analysis of China. In: Proceedings of the 10th International IBPSA Building Simulation Conferences, Beijing, China.

Soukissian TH, Karathanasi FE, Zaragkas DK (2021). Exploiting offshore wind and solar resources in the Mediterranean using ERA5 reanalysis data. Energy Conversion and Management, 237: 114092.
DOI Google Scholar

Sykes A (1990). Macro projects: Status, prospects, and the need for international cooperation. Technology in Society, 12: 157–172.
DOI Google Scholar

Tarek M, Brissette FP, Arsenault R (2020). Evaluation of the ERA5 reanalysis as a potential reference dataset for hydrological modelling over North America. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 24: 2527–2544.
DOI Google Scholar

Thom EC (1958). Cooling degree-days. US Department of Commerce, Weather Bureau.
Google Scholar

Urraca R, Huld T, Gracia-Amillo A, et al. (2018). Evaluation of global horizontal irradiance estimates from ERA5 and COSMO-REA6 reanalyses using ground and satellite-based data. Solar Energy, 164: 339–354.
DOI Google Scholar

Van De Giesen N, Hut R, Andreini M, et al. (2013). Trans-African Hydro-Meteorological Observatory (TAHMO): A network to monitor weather, water, and climate in Africa. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. H52C-04.
Google Scholar

Wang R, Lu S, Zhai X, et al. (2022). The energy performance and passive survivability of high thermal insulation buildings in future climate scenarios. Building Simulation, 15: 1209–1225.
DOI Google Scholar

Wilcox S, Marion W (2008). Users manual for TMY3 data sets. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, USA.
DOI Google Scholar

William M, Urban K (1996). User’s Manual for TMY2S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, USA.
Google Scholar

Yan D, O’Brien W, Hong T, et al. (2015). Occupant behavior modeling for building performance simulation: Current state and future challenges. Energy and Buildings, 107: 264–278.
DOI Google Scholar

Yan D, Zhou X, An J, et al. (2022). DeST 3.0: A new-generation building performance simulation platform. Building Simulation, 15: 1849–1868.
DOI Google Scholar

Zhang G, Wu H, Liu J, et al. (2022). Dynamic performance and energy efficiency of reflective and insulative composite coating on building exterior wall. Building Simulation,https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-022-0932-x
DOI Google Scholar

Zhou X, Lu Y, Hu S, et al. (2023). New perspectives on temporal changes in occupancy characteristics of residential buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 64: 105590.
DOI Google Scholar
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements

Publication history

Received: 29 December 2022
Revised: 15 February 2023
Accepted: 22 February 2023
Published: 26 March 2023
Issue date: June 2023

Copyright

© Tsinghua University Press 2023

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52225801) and Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 8222019).

Return