AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

Quantifying spatiotemporal variability in occupant exposure to an indoor airborne contaminant with an uncertain source location

John E. Castellini Jr.1, Cary A. Faulkner1, Wangda Zuo2,3( ), Michael D. Sohn4
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, UCB 427, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Department Architectural Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
National Renewable Energy National Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401, USA
Energy Analysis and Environmental Impacts Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Show Author Information

Abstract

Well-mixed zone models are often employed to compute indoor air quality and occupant exposures. While effective, a potential downside to assuming instantaneous, perfect mixing is underpredicting exposures to high intermittent concentrations within a room. When such cases are of concern, more spatially resolved models, like computational-fluid dynamics methods, are used for some or all of the zones. But, these models have higher computational costs and require more input information. A preferred compromise would be to continue with a multi-zone modeling approach for all rooms, but with a better assessment of the spatial variability within a room. To do so, we present a quantitative method for estimating a room’s spatiotemporal variability, based on influential room parameters. Our proposed method disaggregates variability into the variability in a room’s average concentration, and the spatial variability within the room relative to that average. This enables a detailed assessment of how variability in particular room parameters impacts the uncertain occupant exposures. To demonstrate the utility of this method, we simulate contaminant dispersion for a variety of possible source locations. We compute breathing-zone exposure during the releasing (source is active) and decaying (source is removed) periods. Using CFD methods, we found after a 30 minutes release the average standard deviation in the spatial distribution of exposure was approximately 28% of the source average exposure, whereas variability in the different average exposures was lower, only 10% of the total average. We also find that although uncertainty in the source location leads to variability in the average magnitude of transient exposure, it does not have a particularly large influence on the spatial distribution during the decaying period, or on the average contaminant removal rate. By systematically characterizing a room’s average concentration, its variability, and the spatial variability within the room important insights can be gained as to how much uncertainty is introduced into occupant exposure predictions by assuming a uniform in-room contaminant concentration. We discuss how the results of these characterizations can improve our understanding of the uncertainty in occupant exposures relative to well-mixed models.

Graphical Abstract

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Building Simulation
Pages 889-913

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Castellini Jr. JE, Faulkner CA, Zuo W, et al. Quantifying spatiotemporal variability in occupant exposure to an indoor airborne contaminant with an uncertain source location. Building Simulation, 2023, 16(6): 889-913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-022-0971-3

1249

Views

11

Crossref

11

Web of Science

11

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 24 August 2022
Revised: 10 November 2022
Accepted: 28 November 2022
Published: 05 March 2023
© Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, under exclusive licence to Tsinghua University Press 2023