Journal Home > Volume 12 , Issue 5

Solar access requirements constitute a significant aspect for the performance of buildings and for the image of cities. The solar envelope is a method used during the schematic design phase to determine the maximum volume that buildings cannot exceed to guarantee good access to direct sunlight in streets and on neighboring facades. However, two major shortcomings exist that prohibit the use of existing solar envelope techniques in practice: They don’t include the neighboring buildings in the overshadowing calculation, and they utilize a fixed start-and-end time inputs for the selection of specific hours of direct solar access. Different direct solar access ordinances exist that require that new buildings do not obstruct direct sun light in existing dwellings: (1) during specific hours, (2) for a quantity of hours, (3) as a fraction of the actual solar access. For the second and third type of ordinances no existing solar envelope methodologies exist. The research presented in this paper develops a computational method that increases the efficacy of the generated solar envelopes including the context in the calculations and provides the possibility to select the quantity and quality of sun light hours, and thus allows the modeler to generate solar envelopes optimized for different objectives. The method aims to help architects and planners to design environmental conscious buildings and urban environments.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

A novel solar envelope method based on solar ordinances for urban planning

Show Author's information Francesco De Luca1( )Timur Dogan2
Tallinn University of Technology, Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Ehitajate tee 5, Tallinn 19086, Estonia
Cornell University, College of Architecture Art and Planning, 240 E. Sibley Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA

Abstract

Solar access requirements constitute a significant aspect for the performance of buildings and for the image of cities. The solar envelope is a method used during the schematic design phase to determine the maximum volume that buildings cannot exceed to guarantee good access to direct sunlight in streets and on neighboring facades. However, two major shortcomings exist that prohibit the use of existing solar envelope techniques in practice: They don’t include the neighboring buildings in the overshadowing calculation, and they utilize a fixed start-and-end time inputs for the selection of specific hours of direct solar access. Different direct solar access ordinances exist that require that new buildings do not obstruct direct sun light in existing dwellings: (1) during specific hours, (2) for a quantity of hours, (3) as a fraction of the actual solar access. For the second and third type of ordinances no existing solar envelope methodologies exist. The research presented in this paper develops a computational method that increases the efficacy of the generated solar envelopes including the context in the calculations and provides the possibility to select the quantity and quality of sun light hours, and thus allows the modeler to generate solar envelopes optimized for different objectives. The method aims to help architects and planners to design environmental conscious buildings and urban environments.

Keywords: building performance, urban planning, solar envelope, direct solar access, environmental design, computational design

References(55)

S Altomonte (2008). Daylight for energy savings and psycho-physiological well-being in sustainable built environments. Journal of Sustainable Development, 1(3): 3-16.
DOI
M Andersen, J Mardaljevic, SW Lockley (2012). A framework for predicting the non-visual effects of daylight - Part I: photobiology-based model. Lighting Research & Technology, 44: 37-53.
DOI
BSI (2008). BS 8206-2:2008. Lighting for buildings. Code of practice for daylighting. London: British Standards Institution.
GZ Brown, M DeKay (2001). Sun, Wind and Light. Architectural Design Strategies, 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
K Butti, J Perlin (1980). A Golden Thread. 2500 Years of Solar Architecture and Technology. Palo Alto, CA, USA: Cheshire Books.
IG Capeluto, E Shaviv (1999). Modeling the design of urban fabric with solar rights considerations. In: Proceedings of the International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference (BS1999), Kyoto, Japan, pp. 1341-347.
IG Capeluto, E Shaviv (2001). On the use of ‘solar volume’ for determining the urban fabric. Solar Energy, 70: 275-280.
DOI
IG Capeluto, B Plotnikov (2017). A method for the generation of climate-based, context-dependent parametric solar envelopes. Architectural Science Review, 60: 395-407.
DOI
City of Ashland (2011). Solar Access. Land Use Ordinance 18.70. Community Development Department, Ashland (OR), USA.
City of Boulder (1981). Solar Access Guide. Section 9-9-17, BRC 1981. City of Boulder Planning and Development Services Center.
HR Coch, A Curreli (2010). Solar access in the compact city: A study case in Barcelona. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference PALENC 2010 Passive & Low Energy Cooling for the Built Environment, Rhodes Island, Greece.
BL Collins (1976). Review of the psychological reaction to windows. Lighting Research & Technology, 8: 80-88.
DOI
S Darula, J Christoffersen, M Malikova (2015). Sunlight and insolation of building interiors. Energy Procedia, 78: 1245-1250.
DOI
M DeKay (1992). A comparative review of daylight planning tools and a rule-of-thumb for street width to building height ratio. In: Proceedings of the 17th National Passive Solar Conference, Boulder CO, USA, pp. 120-125.
F De Luca (2016). Solar envelope optimization method for complex urban environments. In: Proceedings of CAADence in Architecture 2016 Conference, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 223-229.
DOI
F De Luca (2017). Solar form-finding. Subtractive solar envelope and integrated solar collection computational method for high-rise buildings in urban environments. In: Proceedings of Disciplines & Disruption 37th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA2017), Cambridge (MA), USA, pp. 212-221.
F De Luca, H Voll (2017). Computational method for variable objectives and context aware solar envelopes generation. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Simulation for Architecture and Urban Design (SimAUD2017), Toronto, Canada, pp. 335-342.
DIVA (2017). DIVA for Rhino version 4. Solemma LLC. Available at http://solemma.net.
T Dogan, YC Park (2017). A new framework for residential daylight performance evaluation. In: Proceedings of the International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, San Francisco, USA, pp. 170-178.
T Dogan, YC Park (2019). A critical review of daylighting metrics for residential architecture and a new metric for cold and temperate climates. Lighting Research & Technology, 51: 206-230. [LinkOut]
DOI
Estonian Centre for Standardization (2015). Estonian Standard EVS 894:2008/A2:2015 Daylight in Dwellings and Offices. Tallinn: EVS.
Y Geng, H Dong, B Xue, J Fu (2012). An overview of Chinese green building standards. Sustainable Development, 20: 211-221.
DOI
German Institute for Standardization (1999). DIN 5034-1 Daylight in Interiors - Part 1: General Requirements. Berlin: DIN.
D Howard (1989). The Future of Ancient Light. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 6(2): 132-153.
J Hraska (2004). Solar and daylight rights in Slovakia - their meaning for energy and urban design. In: Proceedings of Contexts of Architecture 38th International Conference of Architectural Science Association (ANZAScA), Launceston, Australia.
K Johnsen, R Watkins (2010). Daylighting in Buildings. Energy Conservation in Buildings & Community Systems & Solar Heating and Cooling Programmes, ECBCS Annex 29/SHC Task 21, Birmingham: AECOM.
M Juyal, K Kensek, RL Knowles (2003). SolCAD: 3D Spatial design tool to generate solar envelope. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA2003), Indianapolis, IN, USA, pp. 411-419.
K Kensek, A Henkhaus (2013). Solar access zoning + building information modeling. In: Proceedings of the 38th National Passive Solar Conference, Baltimore, MD, USA.
DOI
RL Knowles (1981). Sun Rhythm Form. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
RL Knowles (2003). The solar envelope: Its meaning for energy and buildings. Energy and Buildings, 35: 15-25.
DOI
M Košir, IG Capeluto, A Krainer, Ž Kristl (2014). Solar potential in existing urban layouts—Critical overview of the existing building stock in Slovenian context. Energy Policy, 69: 443-456.
DOI
R Lechner (1991). Heating, Cooling, Lighting. Design Methods for Architects. New York: Wiley Interscience.
SW Lockley (2009). Circadian rhythms: influence of light in humans. In: LR Squire (ed), Encyclopedia of Neuroscience (Vol. 2), Cambridge, MA, USA: Academic Press. pp. 971-988.
DOI
A Marsh (2003). Computer-optimized shading design. In: Proceedings of the International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, Eindhoven, Netherlands, pp. 831-837.
R McNeel, (2017a). Grasshopper - Generative Modeling with Rhino, McNeel North America, Seattle, USA. http://www.grasshopper3d.com/.
R McNeel, (2017b). Rhinoceros: NURBS Modeling for Windows. Seattle, WA, USA: McNeel North America.
MH Morgan (1914). Translation of: Vitruvius MP (15 BC). The Ten Books on Architecture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
J Niemasz, J Sargent, CF Reinhart (2011). Solar zoning and energy in detached residential dwellings. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Simulation for Architecture and Urban Design (SimAUD2011), Boston, USA, pp. 37-45.
D Noble, K Kensek (1998). Computer generated solar envelopes in architecture. The Journal of Architecture, 3: 117-127.
DOI
C Ratti, E Morello (2005). SunScapes: Extending the ‘solar envelopes’ concept through ‘isosolar’ surfaces. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture (PLEA 2005), Beirut, Lebanon, pp. 815-820.
C Reinhart, S Selkowitz (2006). Daylighting—Light, form, and people. Energy and Buildings, 38: 715-717.
DOI
CF Reinhart (2014). Daylighting Handbook I. Fundamentals. Designing with the Sun. Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press.
C Reinhart (2015). Opinion: Climate-based daylighting metrics in LEEDv4—A fragile progress. Lighting Research & Technology, 47: 388.
DOI
D Robinson, A Stone (2004). Irradiation modelling made simple: the cumulative sky approach and its applications. In: Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture (PLEA 2004), Eindhoven, the Netherlands, pp. 1117-1122.
M Sadeghipour, M Pak (2013). Ladybug: A Parametric environmental plugin for grasshopper to help designers create an environmentally-conscious design. In: Proceedings of the International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference (BS 2013), Chambéry, France, pp. 3128-3135.
E Saratsis, T Dogan, CF Reinhart (2017). Simulation-based daylighting analysis procedure for developing urban zoning rules. Building Research & Information, 45: 478-491.
DOI
N Sokol, J Martyniuk-Peczek (2016). The review of the selected challenges for an incorporation of daylight assessment methods into urban planning in Poland. Procedia Engineering, 161: 2191-2197.
DOI
WJ Smith (2000). Modern Optical Engineering. The Design of Optical Systems. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ministry of Construction of China (1993). Code of Urban Residential Areas Planning & Design - Construction standard No. 542. Beijing: China Institute of Standards & Norms Ministry of Construction. (in Chinese)
B Turkienicz, B Bellaver Gonçalves, P Grazziotin (2008). CityZoom: A visualization tool for the assessment of planning regulations. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 6: 79-95.
DOI
A Vartholomaios (2015). The residential solar block envelope: A method for enabling the development of compact urban blocks with high passive solar potential. Energy and Buildings, 99: 303-312.
DOI
JP Waldram (1923). The natural and artificial lighting of buildings. Journal of the Royal Institute of British Architects, 33(13): 405-426/ 441-446.
GJ Ward (1994). The RADIANCE lighting simulation and rendering system. In: Proceedings 21st International ACM Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH 1994), Orlando, FL, USA, pp. 459-472.
DOI
C Willis (1995). Form Follows Finance. Skyscrapers and Skylines in New York and Chicago. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
UP Yeh (1992). Computer Aided Solar Envelope Design. Master Thesis, University of Southern California, USA.
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements

Publication history

Received: 08 November 2018
Revised: 02 April 2019
Accepted: 22 May 2019
Published: 16 July 2019
Issue date: October 2019

Copyright

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Acknowledgements

The research has been supported by the Estonian Centre of Excellence in Zero Energy and Resource Efficient Smart Buildings and Districts, ZEBE, grant 2014-2020.4.01.15-0016 funded by the European Regional Development Fund.

Return