AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article

The effectiveness of phase change materials in relation to summer thermal comfort in air-conditioned office buildings

Vincenzo Costanzo1Gianpiero Evola2( )Luigi Marletta2Francesco Nocera2
School of the Built Environment, University of Reading, RG6 6AW, Reading, UK
Department of Electric, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Catania, Viale A. Doria 6, 95125, Catania, Italy
Show Author Information

Abstract

The incorporation of Phase Change Materials (PCMs) into the opaque envelope of lightweight buildings is a good solution to compensate for the small thermal inertia, which usually entails pronounced overheating and high space cooling load in summer. However, the position and the thickness of the PCMs, as well as their thermal properties, must be attentively selected in order to ensure their effective operation. This paper shows a comprehensive investigation about the effectiveness of a commercial PCM, available in the form of mats, when installed within drywall partition systems in air-conditioned lightweight office buildings. The study is based on dynamic simulations carried out with EnergyPlus on a typical office building, with the aim to calculate the indoor operative temperature and the cooling load under thermostatic control. The performance for the base case (without PCM) is then compared with the case where PCM mats with various thickness and melting temperature are applied. The analysis is repeated in three different locations, ranging from Southern Europe (Rome, Italy), Continental Europe (Wien, Austria) and Northern Europe (London, UK). The results of the simulations highlight that in lightweight air-conditioned office buildings PCMs contribute to attenuate the inside surface temperature peak by around 0.5 °C, while also reducing the peak cooling load by 10% or even 15%, depending on the PCM thickness and on the outdoor climate. The conclusions may help designers to make the correct choices in terms of thickness of the PCMs, scheduled rate of nighttime ventilation and value of the peak melting temperature.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Building Simulation
Pages 1145-1161

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Costanzo V, Evola G, Marletta L, et al. The effectiveness of phase change materials in relation to summer thermal comfort in air-conditioned office buildings. Building Simulation, 2018, 11(6): 1145-1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-018-0468-2

956

Views

50

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

52

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 27 March 2018
Revised: 05 June 2018
Accepted: 27 July 2018
Published: 17 August 2018
© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018