Journal Home > Volume 10 , Issue 3

Building simulation based optimization involves direct coupling of the optimization algorithm to a simulation model, making it computationally intensive. To overcome this issue, an approach is proposed using a combination of experimental design techniques (fractional factorial design and response surface methodology). These techniques approximate the simulation model behavior using surrogate models, which are several orders of magnitude faster than the simulation model. Fractional factorial design is used to identify the significant design variables. Response surface methodology is used to create surrogate models for the annual cooling and lighting energy with the screened significant variables. The error for these models is less than 10%, validating their effectiveness. These surrogate models speed up optimization with genetic algorithms, for single- and multi-objective optimization problems and scenario analyses, resulting in a better solution. Thus, optimization becomes possible within reasonable computational time with the proposed methodology. This framework is illustrated using the case study of a three-storey office building for New Delhi.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

An approach for building design optimization using design of experiments

Show Author's information Jay Dhariwal1,2( )Rangan Banerjee1
Department of Energy Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400076 India
Department of Architecture, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

Abstract

Building simulation based optimization involves direct coupling of the optimization algorithm to a simulation model, making it computationally intensive. To overcome this issue, an approach is proposed using a combination of experimental design techniques (fractional factorial design and response surface methodology). These techniques approximate the simulation model behavior using surrogate models, which are several orders of magnitude faster than the simulation model. Fractional factorial design is used to identify the significant design variables. Response surface methodology is used to create surrogate models for the annual cooling and lighting energy with the screened significant variables. The error for these models is less than 10%, validating their effectiveness. These surrogate models speed up optimization with genetic algorithms, for single- and multi-objective optimization problems and scenario analyses, resulting in a better solution. Thus, optimization becomes possible within reasonable computational time with the proposed methodology. This framework is illustrated using the case study of a three-storey office building for New Delhi.

Keywords: factorial design, optimization, sensitivity analysis, response surface methodology, surrogate modelling, genetic algorithms

References(37)

BM Adams, SE Mohamed, JB William, RD Keith, PE John, TH Kenneth, EB Lara, et al. (2014). Dakota, a multilevel parallel object-oriented framework for design optimization, parameter estimation, uncertainty quantification, and sensitivity analysis. Version 6.0 theory manual. Albuquerque, NW, USA: Sandia National Laboratories.
LF Alvarez (2000). Design optimization based on genetic programming. PhD Thesis, University of Bradford, UK.
K Deb (2001). Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
J Dhariwal, R Banerjee (2015). Building simulation based optimization through design of experiments. Paper presented at 2nd IBPSA-Italy Conference (BSA2015), Bozen-Bolzano, Italy.
B Eisenhower, Z O’Neill, S Narayanan, VA Fonoberov, I Mezić (2012). A methodology for meta-model based optimization in building energy models. Energy and Buildings, 47: 292–301.
EnergyPlus (2014). EnergyPlus Engineering Reference, the Reference to EnergyPlus Calculations. Available at http://www.energyplus.gov. Accessed 15 Nov 2014.
R Evins, P Pointer, R Vaidyanathan, S Burgess (2012). A case study exploring regulated energy use in domestic buildings using design of experiments and multi-objective optimisation. Building and Environment, 54: 126–136.
GCCA (2015). A Practical Guide to Cool Roofs and Cool Pavements. Global Cool Cities Alliance, Available at http://www.coolrooftoolkit.org/. Accessed 15 Nov 2015.
DJ Gerber, M Ibanez (2014). Paradigms in Computing: Making, Machines, and Models for Design Agency in Architecture. Los Angeles: eVolo.
DJ Gerber, E Pantazis, L Marcolino, A Heydarian (2015). A multi agent systems for design simulation framework: Experiments with virtual physical social feedback for architecture. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Simulation for Architecture & Urban Design (SimAUD), Part of Spring Simulation Multiconference (SpringSim), Alexandria, VA, USA.
X Gong, Y Akashi, D Sumiyoshi (2012). Optimization of passive design measures for residential buildings in different Chinese areas. Building and Environment, 58: 46–57.
IBPSA (2015). BS2015 student competition. Available at http://www.ibpsa.org/?page_id=464. Accessed 15 Nov 2015.
IGBC (2011). Green Building Rating System for New Construction and Major Renovations, LEED 2011 for India. Hyderabad, India: Indian Green Building Council.
B Iooss, P Lemaître (2015). A review on global sensitivity analysis methods. In: G Dellino, C Meloni (eds), Uncertainty Management in Simulation-Optimization of Complex Systems: Algorithms and Applications. New York: Springer. pp. 101–122.
Q Jin, M Overend (2012). Facade renovation for a public building based on a wholelife value approach. In: Proceedings of Building Simulation and Optimization Conference, Loughborough, UK.
OT Karaguzel, R Zhang, KP Lam (2014). Coupling of whole-building energy simulation and multi-dimensional numerical optimization for minimizing the life cycle costs of office buildings. Building Simulation, 7: 111–121.
V Machairas, A Tsangrassoulis, K Axarli (2014). Algorithms for optimization of building design: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 31: 101–112.
L Magnier, F Haghighat (2010). Multiobjective optimization of building design using TRNSYS simulations, genetic algorithm, and Artificial Neural Network. Building and Environment, 45: 739–746.
S Manu, Y Shukla, R Rawal, R de Dear, L Thomas (2014). India Model for Adaptive (thermal) Comfort-IMAC 2014. Ahmedabad: CARBSE. Available at http://www.carbse.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Introduction_IMAC2014.pdf.
MERC (2014). Electricity Tariff for Reliance Infrastructure— Distribution Consumers. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, Available at http://www.rinfra.com/pdf/Tariff_for_ uploading_010414.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2014.
DC Montgomery (2007). Design and Analysis of Experiments. New Delhi: John Wiley & Sons.
N Nassif (2014). Modeling and optimization of HVAC systems using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Building Simulation, 7: 237–245.
JK Nayak, JA Prajapati (2006). Handbook on Energy Conscious Buildings. IIT Bombay and Solar Energy Centre, Ministry of Non-Conventional Energy Sources, Government of India: R & D project no. 3/4(03)/99-SEC.
AT Nguyen, S Reiter (2014). Passive designs and strategies for low-cost housing using simulation-based optimization and different thermal comfort criteria. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 7: 68–81.
AT Nguyen, S Reiter, P Rigo (2014). A review on simulation-based optimization methods applied to building performance analysis. Applied Energy, 113: 1043–1058.
AT Nguyen, S Reiter (2015). A performance comparison of sensitivity analysis methods for building energy models. Building Simulation, 8: 651–664.
RADIANCE (2016). The RADIANCE 4.2 Synthetic Imaging System. Available at http://radsite.lbl.gov/radiance/. Accessed 10 Oct 2016.
T Ramesh, R Prakash, KK Shukla (2012). Life cycle energy analysis of a residential building with different envelopes and climates in Indian context. Applied Energy, 89: 193–202.
CR Reeves, C Wright (1996). Genetic algorithms and the design of experiments. In: LD Davis, K De Jong, MD Vose, LD Whitley (eds), Evolutionary Algorithms. New York: Springer. pp. 207–226.
JJ Robertson, BJ Polly, JM Collis (2015). Reduced-order modeling and simulated annealing optimization for efficient residential building utility bill calibration. Applied Energy, 148: 169–177.
SSEF (2014). Cool Roofs for Cool Delhi. Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation, Available at http://shaktifoundation.in/initiative/cool-roofs-for-cool-delhi/. Accessed 15 Nov 2014.
Stat-Ease (2014). Design-Expert® software, version 9. Available at http://www.statease.com.
W Tian (2013). A review of sensitivity analysis methods in building energy analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 20: 411–419.
E Tresidder, Y Zhang, AIJ Forrester (2012). Acceleration of building design optimisation through the use of Kriging surrogate models. Paper presented at First Building Simulation and Optimization Conference (BSO12), Loughborough, UK.
Twiga (2014). Twiga Insul. Available at http://www.twigafiber.com/twigainsul.php. Accessed 15 Nov 2014.
M Wetter (2009). GenOpt, Generic Optimization Program—User Manual, Version 3.0.0. Technical Report LBNL-2077E. Berkeley, USA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
DOI
M Wetter, J Wright (2004). A comparison of deterministic and probabilistic optimization algorithms for nonsmooth simulation-based optimization. Building and Environment, 39: 989–999.
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements

Publication history

Received: 18 June 2016
Revised: 10 October 2016
Accepted: 19 October 2016
Published: 08 November 2016
Issue date: June 2017

Copyright

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the constructive feedback from the anonymous reviewers; it helped to considerably improve this article. The authors also acknowledge Alonso Dominguez Espinosa and Susan Spilecki from MIT for proofreading this paper.

Return