Journal Home > Volume 9 , Issue 6

With train speed increasing, the heat generation from its key equipment is growing as well and the cooling and ventilation of the equipment cabin become more and more important. In this paper, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method is adopted to simulate the airflow and the temperature field in indoor and outdoor space of the equipment cabin when the train moves at 250 km/h in open space. The simulation results indicate that the surface temperature of the main heat generation equipment is not beyond the limit. When the train moves forward and backward, the maximum average surface temperature of the heat generation equipment is 56.5 °C and 71.7 °C, respectively, and the airflow rates of the fans in the equipment cabin are decreased by 9.1% and 5.2%, if compared to the rated value, respectively. Both forward and backward running conditions should be considered when designing the layout of the equipment and grilles. It is suggested that, the major heat generation equipment should be located in the middle of the cabin; the flow rate decrement of the cooling fan when the train moves at 250 km/h should be taken into account.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Numerical simulation on the temperature field in an equipment cabin of a high-speed railway train

Show Author's information Qiong Jia1Chunjing Xia3Jianbin Zang1Deng Pan2Jun Xu3Naiping Gao1( )
School of Mechanical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
Shanghai DFYH Tech Services Co. Ltd, China
CRRC Changchun Railway Vehicles Co. Ltd, China

Abstract

With train speed increasing, the heat generation from its key equipment is growing as well and the cooling and ventilation of the equipment cabin become more and more important. In this paper, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method is adopted to simulate the airflow and the temperature field in indoor and outdoor space of the equipment cabin when the train moves at 250 km/h in open space. The simulation results indicate that the surface temperature of the main heat generation equipment is not beyond the limit. When the train moves forward and backward, the maximum average surface temperature of the heat generation equipment is 56.5 °C and 71.7 °C, respectively, and the airflow rates of the fans in the equipment cabin are decreased by 9.1% and 5.2%, if compared to the rated value, respectively. Both forward and backward running conditions should be considered when designing the layout of the equipment and grilles. It is suggested that, the major heat generation equipment should be located in the middle of the cabin; the flow rate decrement of the cooling fan when the train moves at 250 km/h should be taken into account.

Keywords: numerical simulation, temperature field, high-speed train, equipment cabin

References(15)

CJ Baker (1991a). Ground vehicles in high cross winds Part I: Steady aerodynamic forces. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 5: 69-90.
CJ Baker (1991b). Ground vehicles in high crosswinds Part II: Unsteady aerodynamic forces. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 5: 91-111.
CJ Baker (1991c). Ground vehicles in high crosswinds part III: The interaction of aerodynamic forces and the vehicle system. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 5: 221-241.
CJ Baker, ND Humphreys (1996). Assessment of the adequacy of various wind tunnel techniques to obtain aerodynamic data for ground vehicles in cross winds. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 60: 49-68.
BL Broadhead, BT Rearden, CM Hopper, JJ Wagschal, CV Parks (2004). Sensitivity-and uncertainty-based criticality safety validation techniques. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 146: 340-366.
IB Celik, U Ghia, PJ Roache (2008). Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, 130(7): 078001.
L Eça, M Hoekstra, PJ Roache (2007). Verification of calculations: An overview of the 2nd Lisbon Workshop. Paper presented at 2nd Workshop on CFD Uncertainty Analysis, AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Portugal.
JH Ferziger,, M Peric (1996). Further discussion of numerical errors in CFD. Methods Fluids, 23: 1263-1274.
DOI
SD Huang, LT Fan, FL Li (2013). Research on temperature distribution and variation rule of CRH3 EMU equipment cabin. Journal of Dalian University, 34(5): 54-57. (in Chinese)
Y Jiang, D Alexander, H Jenkins, R Arthur, Q Chen (2003). Natural ventilation in buildings: measurement in a wind tunnel and numerical simulation with large-eddy simulation. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 91: 331-353.
PJ Roache (1994). Perspective: A method for uniform reporting of grid refinement studies. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 116: 405-413.
SG Tan (2008). The analysis of aerodynamic characteristics of the high-speed train under side wind. PhD Thesis, Southwest Jiaotong University, China. (in Chinese)
B Zhang, XF Liang (2000). Test and research with cars for measurement of surface pressure distribution on quasi-high speed trains. Rolling Stock, 38(10): 14-16. (in Chinese)
L Zhang, FB Kong, JY Zhang (2015). Effect of grille on heat dissipation performance of high-speed train equipment compartment. Computer Aided Engineering, 24(2): 22-28. (in Chinese)
J Zhang, J Li, H Tian, G Gao, J Sheridan (2016). Impact of ground and wheel boundary conditions on numerical simulation of the high-speed train aerodynamic performance. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 61: 249-261.
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements

Publication history

Received: 25 January 2016
Revised: 07 April 2016
Accepted: 28 April 2016
Published: 23 June 2016
Issue date: December 2016

Copyright

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the support by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

Return