Journal Home > Volume 9 , Issue 2

The building sector offers significant opportunities for reducing the energy consumption with considerable economic, environmental and health benefits. Governments can lead the way by retrofitting existing public buildings to reinforce their commitment to improve energy efficiency. Similar design standards, end-uses and operational profiles are usually established for public buildings based on the services they offer. Retrofitting a public building can therefore serve as an ideal test-bed for energy efficiency measures for other buildings within a particular service category. This study first analysed the current electricity consumption of a public office building in Mauritius, located in the Southern Hemisphere. A complete model of the building was created, validated and then simulated to investigate the impact of realistic retrofit strategies on the electricity consumption. Results showed that lighting retrofit achieved the most significant reduction while measures that improved the thermal envelope of the building resulted in smaller energy savings. The possibility of exploiting solar energy was explored by simulating a 70 kWp photovoltaic system installed on the roof. An equivalent of 8.5% of the annual electricity consumption of the building could thus be generated. A financial analysis is also presented for all retrofit scenarios in terms of annual return and payback period.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

A case study for the evaluation of realistic energy retrofit strategies for public office buildings in the Southern Hemisphere

Show Author's information Vishwamitra Oree1( )Abdel Khoodaruth2Hemanand Teemul3
Electrical and Electronic Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, 5th Floor, Sir E. Lim Fat Engineering Tower, University of Mauritius, Reduit, Mauritius
Mechanical and Production Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Mauritius, Reduit, Mauritius
Energy Services Division, Ministry of Public Infrastructure and Land Transport, Port Louis, Mauritius

Abstract

The building sector offers significant opportunities for reducing the energy consumption with considerable economic, environmental and health benefits. Governments can lead the way by retrofitting existing public buildings to reinforce their commitment to improve energy efficiency. Similar design standards, end-uses and operational profiles are usually established for public buildings based on the services they offer. Retrofitting a public building can therefore serve as an ideal test-bed for energy efficiency measures for other buildings within a particular service category. This study first analysed the current electricity consumption of a public office building in Mauritius, located in the Southern Hemisphere. A complete model of the building was created, validated and then simulated to investigate the impact of realistic retrofit strategies on the electricity consumption. Results showed that lighting retrofit achieved the most significant reduction while measures that improved the thermal envelope of the building resulted in smaller energy savings. The possibility of exploiting solar energy was explored by simulating a 70 kWp photovoltaic system installed on the roof. An equivalent of 8.5% of the annual electricity consumption of the building could thus be generated. A financial analysis is also presented for all retrofit scenarios in terms of annual return and payback period.

Keywords: modelling, electricity consumption, retrofit, public building, office

References(26)

H Allcott, S Mullainathan (2010). Behavior and energy policy. Science, 327: 1204-1205.
F Ardente, M Beccali, M Cellura, M Mistretta (2011). Energy and environmental benefits in public buildings as a result of retrofit actions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15: 460-470.
ASHRAE Climatic Design Conditions (2009). Available at http://ashrae-meteo.info/. Accessed 14 Oct. 2015.
Central Electricity Board (2014a). Integrated Electricity Plan 2013-2022: Demand Forecast for Mauritius. Available at http://ceb.intnet.mu/CorporateInfo/IEP2013/Chapter4_Demand%20Forecast%20for%20 Mauritius.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec. 2014.
Central Electricity Board (2014b). Commercial Tariff. Available at http://ceb.intnet.mu/tariffs/commercial.asp. Accessed 28 Dec. 2014.
CIBSE (2006). CIBSE Guide A: Environmental design. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers.
CIBSE (2012). CIBSE Guide F: Energy Efficiency in Buildings. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers.
SE Chidiac, EJ Catania, E Morofsky, S Foo (2011). Effectiveness of single and multiple energy retrofit measures on the energy consumption of office buildings. Energy, 36: 5037-5052.
S Chirarattananon, J Taweekun (2003). A technical review of energy conservation programs for commercial and government buildings in Thailand. Energy Conversion and Management, 44: 743-762.
DH Chow, Li Zhilei, J Darkwa (2013). The effectiveness of retrofitting existing public buildings in face of future climate change in the hot summer cold winter region of China. Energy and Buildings, 57: 176-186.
D Fiaschi, R Badinelli, S Conti (2012). A case study for energy issues of public buildings and utilities in a small municipality: Investigation of possible improvements and integration of renewables. Applied Energy, 97: 101-114.
AG Hestnes, NU Kofoed (2002). Elective retrofitting scenarios for energy efficiency and comfort: Results of the design and evaluation activities within the OFFICE project. Building and Environment, 37: 569-574.
RK Jain, JE Taylor, PJ Culligan (2013). Investigating the impact eco-feedback information representation has on building occupant energy consumption behavior and savings. Energy and Buildings, 64: 408-414.
D Kalz, S Herkel, M Sonntag, J Pfafferott (2014). Energy efficient cooling and thermal comfort for office buildings—long-term monitoring in 42 buildings. Bauphysik, 36: 221-235.
SM Kang, R Seager, DMW Frierson, X Liu (2015). Croll Revisited: Why is the northern hemisphere warmer than the southern hemisphere? Climate Dynamics, 44: 1457-1472.
D Kim (2010). Optimizing cost effective energy conservation measures for building envelope. Energy Engineering, 107(3): 70-80.
JS Li (2008). A study of energy performance and efficiency improvement procedures of government offices in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Energy and Buildings, 40: 1872-1875.
Z Ma, P Cooper, D Daly, L Ledo (2012). Existing building retrofits: Methodology and state-of-the-art. Energy and Buildings, 55: 889-902.
Mauritius Meteorological Services (2014). Climate of Mauritius. Available at http://metservice.intnet.mu/climate-services/climate-of-mauritius.php. Accessed 16 Dec. 2014.
McKinsey and Company (2009). Pathways to a Low Carbon Economy: Version 2 of the Global Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Curve. Available at https://solutions.mckinsey.com/Climate Desk/default.aspx. Accessed 27 Dec. 2014.
OT Mososo, LJ Grobler (2010). The dark side of occupants' behaviour on building energy use. Energy and Buildings, 42: 173-177.
AL Pisello, F Asdrubali (2014). Human-based energy retrofits in residential buildings: A cost-effective alternative to traditional physical strategies. Applied Energy, 133: 224-235.
Statistics Mauritius (2014). Population and vital statistics: Republic of Mauritius. Available at http://statsmauritius.govmu.org/English/StatsbySubj/Pages/Population-Jan-June-2014.aspx. Accessed 05 Dec. 2015.
UNEP (2009). Buildings and Climate: Summary for Decision-Makers. United Nations Environment Programme Sustainable Buildings & Climate Initiative. Available at http://www.unep.org/sbci/pdfs/sbci-bccsummary.pdf. Accessed 22 Dec. 2014.
University of Cambridge (2014). Energy modelling and building physics resource base: IES Virtual Environment. Available at http://www-embp.eng.cam.ac.uk/software/iesve. Accessed 15 Dec. 2014.
J Wade, J Pett, L Ramsay (2003). Energy Efficiency in Offices: Assessing the Situation. London: The Association for the Conservation of Energy.
Publication history
Copyright

Publication history

Received: 01 March 2015
Revised: 23 October 2015
Accepted: 26 October 2015
Published: 10 November 2015
Issue date: April 2016

Copyright

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Return