Journal Home > Volume 4 , Issue 3

The rail based urban transport system is being developed for national capital of India, New Delhi. The smoke control using ventilation in case of fire inside the tunnel, similar to Delhi Metro corridor has been investigated using computational fluid dynamics technique. A section of tunnel having dimensions 400 m long, 5.5 m wide and 6 m high is considered for simulation. The analysis has been carried out by assuming a variable fire source with a peak heat release rate (HRR) of 16 MW, located at the center of the tunnel. Ventilation ducts are located in the ceiling near the tunnel portals and are inclined at 10 degrees to the plane of the ceiling through which fans discharge air. The influence of the fire HRR curve slope on the smoke flow dynamics in a realistic tunnel model fitted with jet injection type longitudinal ventilation system has been investigated. In case of fire two cases are studied: (1) fans activated immediately after detection, (2) fans activated at delayed times to take into account the response time for the fans to achieve its maximum speed. The velocity of supply and exhaust fans necessary to remove smoke in 30 s from the upstream direction is determined. The velocities of fan required to produce desired critical velocity in the longitudinal direction for different HRR of fire is predicted.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Numerical studies on evaluation of smoke control system of underground metro rail transport system in India having jet injection system: A case study

Show Author's information Shorab Jain1 Shashi2Surendra Kumar2( )
Fire Research Division, CSIR—Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee247667, Uttarakhand, India
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee247667, Uttarakhand, India

Abstract

The rail based urban transport system is being developed for national capital of India, New Delhi. The smoke control using ventilation in case of fire inside the tunnel, similar to Delhi Metro corridor has been investigated using computational fluid dynamics technique. A section of tunnel having dimensions 400 m long, 5.5 m wide and 6 m high is considered for simulation. The analysis has been carried out by assuming a variable fire source with a peak heat release rate (HRR) of 16 MW, located at the center of the tunnel. Ventilation ducts are located in the ceiling near the tunnel portals and are inclined at 10 degrees to the plane of the ceiling through which fans discharge air. The influence of the fire HRR curve slope on the smoke flow dynamics in a realistic tunnel model fitted with jet injection type longitudinal ventilation system has been investigated. In case of fire two cases are studied: (1) fans activated immediately after detection, (2) fans activated at delayed times to take into account the response time for the fans to achieve its maximum speed. The velocity of supply and exhaust fans necessary to remove smoke in 30 s from the upstream direction is determined. The velocities of fan required to produce desired critical velocity in the longitudinal direction for different HRR of fire is predicted.

Keywords: computational fluid dynamics, ventilation, tunnel fires, inclined ducts

References(26)

AEA Technology (2002). CFX 5.5.1 User Manual.
WK Chow (1996). Simulation of tunnel fires using a zone model. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 11: 221-236.
G Cox (1998). Turbulent closure and the modeling of fire using CFD. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 356: 2835-2854.
G Cox, S Kumar (2002). Modeling enclosure fires using CFD. In: SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering (Chapters 3-8). Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association.
NH Danziger, WD Kennedy (1982). Longitudinal ventilation analysis for the Glenwood Canyon tunnels. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on the Aerodynamics and Ventilation of Vehicle Tunnels (pp. 169-186), York, UK.
GB Grant, SF Jagger, CJ Lea (1998). Fires in tunnels. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 356: 2873-2906.
G Heskestad (1995). Fire plumes. In: SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering (Chapter 2). Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association.
H Ingason (2006). Design fires in tunnels. Paper presented at the 2nd International Symposium on Safe & Reliable Tunnels, Innovative European Achievements, Lausanne, Switzerland.
S Jagger, G Grant (2005). Use of tunnel ventilation for fire safety. In: A Beard, R Carvel (eds), The Handbook of Tunnel Fire Safety (Chapter 8, pp. 163-183). London: Thomas Telford.
S Jain, , S Kumar (2007). Studies on evaluation of ventilation strategies of underground metro rail transport system. In: Proceedings of the 7th Asia-Oceania Symposium on Fire Science and Technology (pp. 775-786), Hong Kong, China.
S Jain, , S Kumar, TP Sharma (2008). Numerical simulation of fire in a tunnel: Comparative study of CFAST and CFX predictions. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 23: 160-170.
S Jain (2009). CFD analysis of tunnel fires. PhD Dissertation, Depart-ment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India.
K Kang (2006). Computational study of longitudinal ventilation control during an enclosure fire within a tunnel. Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 16: 159-181.
S Kumar, G Cox (1985). Mathematical modelling of fire in road tunnels. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Aerodynamics and Ventilation of Vehicle Tunnels, BHRA (pp. 61-76), Lille, France.
S Kumar, G Cox (1988). Radiation and surface roughness effects in the numerical modeling of enclosure fires. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Fire Safety Science (pp. 851-860), Tokyo, Japan.
DOI
S Kumar, G Cox (2001). Some guidance on “Correct” use of CFD models for fire applications with examples. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interflam (pp. 823-834), Edinburgh, UK.
NFPA 92A (2000). Recommended Practice for Smoke-Control Systems. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association.
Y Oka, GT Atkinson (1995). Control of smoke flow in tunnel fires. Fire Safety Journal, 25: 305-322.
SV Patankar (1980). Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. New York: Taylor & Francis.
YL Sinai (2003). Field modelling of a steckler experiment: An example of the relationship between the level of modelling and accuracy. Paper presented in the 4th International Seminar on Fire & Explosion Hazards, Londonerry, UK.
KD Steckler, JG Quintiere, WJ Rinkinen (1982). Flow Induced by Fire in a Compartment. NBSIR 82-2520. Gaithersburg, MD: National Bureau of Standards.
PH Thomas (1970). Movement of smoke in horizontal corridors against an airflow. Institution of Fire Engineers, 30(77): 45-53.
J Wang, J Hua, K Kumar, S Kumar (2006). Evaluation of CFD modelling methods for fire induced airflow in a room. Journal of Fire Sciences, 24: 393-411.
Y Wu, MZA Bakar (2000). Control of smoke flow in tunnel fires using longitudinal ventilation systems—A study of the critical velocity. Fire Safety Journal, 35: 363-390.
H Xue, JC Ho, YM Cheng (2001). Comparison of different combustion models in enclosure fire simulation. Fire Safety Journal, 36: 37-54.
GH Yeoh, RKK Yuen, SCP Chueng, WK Kwok (2003). On modeling combustion, radiation and soot processes in compartment fires. Building and Environment, 38: 771-785.
Publication history
Copyright

Publication history

Received: 10 June 2010
Revised: 13 February 2011
Accepted: 21 February 2011
Published: 28 March 2011
Issue date: September 2011

Copyright

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011
Return