Journal Home > Volume 3 , Issue 1

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has reported that up to half of non-fatal CO poisoning incidents during the hurricane seasons in 2004 and 2005 involved generators operated outdoors but within seven feet of the home. The guidance provided on the safe operating distance of a generator is often neither specific nor consistent. Furthermore, some generator manufacturers recommend the use of extension cords to be " as short as possible to prevent voltage drop and possible overheating of wires". This study modeled multiple scenarios of a portable generator operated outdoors using the CONTAM indoor air quality model coupled with a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model to predict CO concentrations near and within a home. The simulation cases included both human-controllable factors (e.g., generator location and exhaust direction and window opening size) and non-controllable factors (e.g., wind, temperature, and house dimensions). For the house modeled in this study, a generator positioned 4.6 m (15 feet) away from open windows may not be far enough to limit CO entry into the house. It was also found that winds perpendicular to the open window resulted in more CO infiltration than winds at an angle, and lower wind speed generally led to more CO entry. To reduce CO entry, the generator should ideally be positioned outside of airflow recirculation region near the open windows.

Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements

Publication history

Received: 01 December 2009
Revised: 12 February 2010
Accepted: 20 February 2010
Published: 05 March 2010
Issue date: March 2010

Copyright

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Acknowledgements

This work was sponsored by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under Interagency Agreement No. 08FED894639.

Return