Journal Home > Volume 3 , Issue 3

Use of a HEPA (high efficiency particulate air) filter in a room is believed to assist in reducing the risk of transmission of infectious diseases through removing the particles or large droplets to which pathogens may be attached. Use of a portable HEPA filter(s) in hospital wards is hypothesized to increase the effective ventilation rate (for particles only). Use of a portable HEPA filter is also hypothesized to increase the effective airflow rate of the general ward to the standard of an isolation ward for emerging infection diseases. This may be a good solution for housing patients when the number of beds in an isolation ward is insufficient. An experiment was conducted in a full scale experimental ward with a dimension of 6.7 m × 6 m × 2.7 m and 6 beds to test these hypotheses for a portable HEPA filter. The removal efficiency for different size particles was measured at different locations. The influence of the portable HEPA air cleaner on the airflow pattern was also studied through smoke visualization and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. Results show that the HEPA filter can effectively decrease the particle concentration level. The effective air change rate achieved by the HEPA filter (for particle removal only) is from 2.7 to 5.6 ACH in the ward. The strong supply air jet from the portable HEPA filter interacted with the room airflow pattern and became dominate, introducing global airflow mixing in the room. Background noise levels were also measured and noise level in the room increased when the maximum airflow of the filter was used.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Particle removal efficiency of the portable HEPA air cleaner in a simulated hospital ward

Show Author's information Hua Qian1,2( )Yuguo Li2Hequan Sun2,3Peter V. Nielsen4Xinghua Huang2Xiaohong Zheng1
School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China
Department of Military Oceanography, Dalian Naval Academy, Dalian 116018, China
Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark

Abstract

Use of a HEPA (high efficiency particulate air) filter in a room is believed to assist in reducing the risk of transmission of infectious diseases through removing the particles or large droplets to which pathogens may be attached. Use of a portable HEPA filter(s) in hospital wards is hypothesized to increase the effective ventilation rate (for particles only). Use of a portable HEPA filter is also hypothesized to increase the effective airflow rate of the general ward to the standard of an isolation ward for emerging infection diseases. This may be a good solution for housing patients when the number of beds in an isolation ward is insufficient. An experiment was conducted in a full scale experimental ward with a dimension of 6.7 m × 6 m × 2.7 m and 6 beds to test these hypotheses for a portable HEPA filter. The removal efficiency for different size particles was measured at different locations. The influence of the portable HEPA air cleaner on the airflow pattern was also studied through smoke visualization and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. Results show that the HEPA filter can effectively decrease the particle concentration level. The effective air change rate achieved by the HEPA filter (for particle removal only) is from 2.7 to 5.6 ACH in the ward. The strong supply air jet from the portable HEPA filter interacted with the room airflow pattern and became dominate, introducing global airflow mixing in the room. Background noise levels were also measured and noise level in the room increased when the maximum airflow of the filter was used.

Keywords: particle, portable HEPA filter, hospital ward

References(13)

AEA Technology (1994). Testing of HEPA and ventilation filters. Filtration & Separation, 31,781.
L Antonicelli, MB Bilo, S Pucci, C Schou, F Bonifazi (1991). Efficacy of an air-cleaning device equipped with a high-efficiency particulate air filter in house dust mite respiratory allergy. Allergy, 46: 594-600.
H Brohus (1997). Personal exposure to contaminant sources in ventilated rooms (p. 22). Department of Building Technology and Structural Engineering. Aalborg University, Aalborg.
Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2003). Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control in Health-Care Facilities. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, USA.
YS Cheng, JC Lu, TR Chen (1998). Efficiency of a portable indoor air cleaner in removing pollens and fungal spores. Aerosol Science and Technology, 29: 92-101.
CD Cheong, HG. Neumeister-Kemp, PW Dingle, GS Hardy (2004). Intervention study of airborne fungal spora in homes with portable HEPA filtration units. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 6: 866-873.
SJ Emmerich, SJ Nabinger (2001). Measurement and simulation of the IAQ impact of particle air cleaners in a single-zone building. HVAC&R Research, 7: 223-244.
JH Ferziger, M Peric (2002). Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, 3rd edn. Berlin: Springer.
DOI
AE Johnson, RC Brown (1998). Measurement of the performance of air cleaners against the particulate element of rosin-based solder flux fume. Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 42: 511-519.
KS Lam, FS Chan, WY Fung, BSS Lui, LWL Lau (2006). Achieving ‘excellent' indoor air quality in commercial offices equipped with air-handling unit-respirable suspended particulate. Indoor Air, 16: 86-97.
A Novoselac, JA Siegel (2009). Impact of placement of portable air cleaning devices in multizone residential environments. Building and Environment, 44: 2348-2356.
M Ward, JA Siegel, RL Corsi (2005). The effectiveness of stand alone air cleaners for shelter-in-place. Indoor Air, 15: 127-134.
T Zhang, S Wang, G Sun, L Xu, D Takaoka (2010). Flow impact of an air conditioner to portable air cleaning. Building and Environment, 15, 2047-2056.
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements

Publication history

Received: 30 November 2009
Revised: 03 May 2010
Accepted: 07 June 2010
Published: 30 July 2010
Issue date: September 2010

Copyright

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Acknowledgements

The work described in this paper was supported by the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong SAR Government (Project No. HKU 7150/06E), Research Grants from National Nature and Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Project No. 50808038), and Jiangsu Nature and Science Foundation (Project No. BK2009289).

Return