AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home Food Science Article
PDF (3.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Effects of Different Liquid Nitrogen Spray Quick-Freezing Temperatures on the Freezing Characteristics and Quality of Agrocybe praecox

Jueqin LIANG1 Xiaolei HAN1Meijuan YU1Guoshun YANG2Wei FAN3 ( )Huiying LÜ1 ( )
Dongting Laboratory, Hunan Institute of Agricultural Product Processing and Quality Safety, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410125, China
Hunan Boda Tianneng Industrial Co., Ltd., Yiyang 413100, China
School of Food Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

This study investigated the effects of different liquid nitrogen spray quick-freezing (LNF) temperatures on the freezing characteristics and multiple quality indicators of Agrocybe praecox, in order to provide a theoretical basis for optimizing its quick-freezing process.

Methods

Fresh A. praecox samples were subjected to LNF at –40, –60, –80, and –100 ℃ or conventional air freezing (RF) at –18 and –40 ℃. The freezing curve, drip loss, color, texture properties (hardness, elasticity, and chewiness), cell membrane integrity (relative electrical conductivity and MDA content), nutritional components (total phenols, total flavonoids, soluble sugars, soluble proteins, and free amino acids) and antioxidant activity (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging capacity, and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP)) were measured. Correlation analysis was also conducted.

Results

The freezing characteristics of A. praecox varied greatly under different freezing temperatures. LNF treatment significantly increased the freezing rate and shortened the time required to pass through the maximum ice crystal formation zone (only 22 seconds at –100 ℃). Compared with the RF group, the LNF group exhibited significantly lower drip loss, color closer to that of fresh samples (lower ΔE values), better texture maintenance, reduced cell membrane damage, better retention of nutrients, and stronger antioxidant activity (lower half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values against DPPH radicals and higher FRAP values). Among the LNF groups, the treatments at –60 and –80 ℃ showed the best overall performance, with antioxidant activity closest to that of fresh samples, while the –100 ℃ treatment offered slight advantages in certain indicators but with limited improvement.

Conclusion

Liquid nitrogen spray quick-freezing effectively preserves the freezing quality of A. praecox with the optimal temperature being in the range of −60 to −80 ℃. Freezing rate is a key factor influencing the quality of A. praecox, and rapid freezing reduces ice crystal damage, protecting cell structure and nutritional components and preserving antioxidant activity.

CLC number: TS201.2 Document code: A Article ID: 1002-6630(2026)06-0292-12

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Food Science
Pages 292-303

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
LIANG J, HAN X, YU M, et al. Effects of Different Liquid Nitrogen Spray Quick-Freezing Temperatures on the Freezing Characteristics and Quality of Agrocybe praecox. Food Science, 2026, 47(6): 292-303. https://doi.org/10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20251013-064

141

Views

1

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 13 October 2025
Published: 25 March 2026
© Beijing Academy of Food Sciences 2026.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).