AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home Food Science Article
PDF (4.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Comparative Analysis of Sensory Quality and Chemical Composition between Jinhua White Tea and Fu Brick Tea

Mingzhu WEI1,2 Zhiyuan LIN2Wanjing ZHONG2Jiakun PENG2Caixia GAO2Xuan MIAO2Yu XIAO1 ( )Weidong DAI2 ( )
School of Food Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310008, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

This study included four Jinhua white tea samples and five Fu brick tea samples to systematically investigate the differences in sensory quality and chemical composition between the two types of tea. Sensory evaluation results showed that compared with Fu brick tea infusion, Jinhua white tea infusion exhibited a redder color with a sweet, fruity aroma and a sweet, mild/mellow taste profile. A total of 130 compounds were identified in the tea samples using a metabolomics approach based on liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), including 8 alkaloids, 9 amino acids, 13 dimeric catechins, 16 N-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinone-substituted flavan-3-ol (EPSF), 15 flavanols, 31 flavanols and flavanol-O-glycosides, 2 flavonoids, 2 lipids, 8 organic acids, 11 phenolic acids, 7 catechin B-ring cleavage derivatives, and 8 other compounds. Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and heatmap analysis revealed significant differences in chemical composition between Jinhua white tea and Fu brick tea. Among these, 78 significantly differential compounds were identified (P < 0.05). Amino acid content was generally higher in Jinhua white tea than in Fu brick tea. Jinhua white tea had lower levels of esterified catechins (epigallocatechin gallate, epicatechin gallate, gallocatechin gallate, and catechin gallate) but higher levels of non-esterified catechins (epicatechin and epigallocatechin) than Fu brick tea. The contents of catechin dimers (theaflavins, theasinesins, and procyanidins), as well as those of 4 differential catechin derivatives with B-ring cleavage, were generally higher in Jinhua white tea than in Fu brick tea. The contents of 12 EPSFs were significantly lower in Jinhua white tea than in Fu brick tea. The levels of flavanols and flavanol-O-glycosides were lower in Fu brick tea than in Jinhua white tea. The contents of caffeine and guanylate (GMP) were both significantly higher in Jinhua white tea than in Fu brick tea. This study provides a theoretical basis for clarifying the health benefits of Jinhua white tea.

CLC number: S571 Document code: A Article ID: 1002-6630(2026)07-0221-11

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Food Science
Pages 221-231

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
WEI M, LIN Z, ZHONG W, et al. Comparative Analysis of Sensory Quality and Chemical Composition between Jinhua White Tea and Fu Brick Tea. Food Science, 2026, 47(7): 221-231. https://doi.org/10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20251011-049

172

Views

1

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 11 October 2025
Published: 15 April 2026
© Beijing Academy of Food Sciences 2026.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).