AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home Food Science Article
PDF (3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Differentiating Odor Compounds of Common Poultry Eggs Based on Gas Chromatography-Olfactometry-Orbitrap High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry

Xue GAO1 Weihai XING2Yanan YU2Junmin ZHANG2Youyou YANG2 ( )Riliang CAO1 ( )
College of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

This study employed gas chromatography-olfactometry coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry (GC-O-HRMS) to analyze volatile odor compounds in four common types of commercial poultry eggs, aiming to clarify the primary sources of egg flavor and reveal the flavor characteristics of eggs from different species of poultry. After cooking, volatile compounds from the egg samples were enriched using headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and detected by gas chromatography-orbitrap mass spectrometry, and their odor characteristics were analyzed using an olfactometer. By matching mass spectra and retention indices against the NIST library and a self-built mass spectral library, volatile aldehydes, hydrocarbons, and sulfur- or nitrogen-containing compounds were identified in both egg yolk and white, while the number of these compounds was significantly higher in egg yolk than in egg white. Quail egg yolk exhibited the greatest variety of volatile compounds (61) and the highest relative content of sulfur- or nitrogen-containing compounds (37.25%), with the relative content of 2-methylpyrazine (roasted, biscuit-like aroma) significantly increasing compared with that of chicken egg yolk. Goose egg yolk had the lowest relative content of hydrocarbons (25.20%). Chicken egg yolk showed a relatively high aldehyde content (29.13%) and exclusively contained 2,5-hexanedione (creamy aroma). Duck egg yolk was characterized by a high benzaldehyde content (bitter almond-like odor). Principal component analysis (PCA) demonstrated clear clustering of volatile compounds from the egg yolks and whites of the four poultry species. Furthermore, 37 differential volatile markers were selected from the yolks based on volcano plot analysis, of which 20 exhibited clear sensory contributions. This study confirms that poultry egg flavor originates mainly from the yolk and reveals that the differences in yolk flavor profiles in eggs from different poultry species are primarily due to variations in the types and contents of aldehydes, hydrocarbons, and sulfur- and nitrogen-containing compounds. The findings provide a scientific basis and technical support for distinguishing the flavor profiles of eggs from different poultry species and for developing high-quality egg products, thereby contributing to the high-quality development of the poultry egg industry.

CLC number: TS253 Document code: A Article ID: 1002-6630(2026)07-0211-10

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Food Science
Pages 211-220

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
GAO X, XING W, YU Y, et al. Differentiating Odor Compounds of Common Poultry Eggs Based on Gas Chromatography-Olfactometry-Orbitrap High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry. Food Science, 2026, 47(7): 211-220. https://doi.org/10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20250929-238

127

Views

2

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 29 September 2025
Published: 15 April 2026
© Beijing Academy of Food Sciences 2026.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).