AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home Food Science Article
PDF (4.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Effects of Mung Bean Varieties on Textural Characteristics and Sensory Quality of Fermented Mung Bean Milk

Jinqi LIU Tong ZHULina XINGShuangneng LIUSumei ZHOUJing LU ( )
Key Laboratory of Geriatric Nutrition and Health, Ministry of Education, Beijing Engineering and Technology Research Center of Food Additives, School of Food and Health, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

In this study, fermented mung bean milk was prepared from 12 commonly cultivated Chinese mung bean varieties, and the effects of these varieties on the textural properties and sensory quality of fermented mung bean milk were investigated. It was found that fermented mung bean milk prepared from the cultivar B9 exhibited the highest water-holding capacity of 53.23%, the highest hardness of 70.66 g, the highest apparent viscosity, an average particle size of 3.65 μm, and the highest absolute value of zeta potential of 16.23 mV. The gel structure of the fermented mung bean milk was dense with small pore size, and it scored high in sensory evaluation, demonstrating that B9 was the most suitable variety for the preparation of fermented mung bean milk. In this study, we explored the raw material characteristics affecting the quality of fermented mung bean milk, and found that mung bean with a high protein content and a high content of vicilin-like subunit (55 kDa) is suitable for the preparation of fermented mung bean milk with excellent textural and organoleptic qualities. The above indexes can serve as criteria for the selection of suitable varieties for the processing of fermented mung bean milk.

CLC number: TS252.42 Document code: A Article ID: 1002-6630(2025)05-0106-08

References

[1]

AN G, PARK S, HA J. The enhancement effect of mungbean on the physical, functional, and sensory characteristics of soy yoghurt[J]. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14(1): 3684. DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-54106-9.

[2]

LIANG Z Q, SUN J W, YANG S, et al. Fermentation of mung bean milk by Lactococcus lactis: focus on the physicochemical properties, antioxidant capacities and sensory evaluation[J]. Food Bioscience, 2022, 48: 101798. DOI:10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101798.

[3]

ZANG J W, YAN B X, HU H Y, et al. RETRACTED: the current advances, challenges, and future trends of plant-based yogurt[J]. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2024, 149: 104531. DOI:10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104531.

[4]

MONTEMURRO M, PONTONIO E, CODA R, et al. Plant-based alternatives to yogurt: state-of-the-art and perspectives of new biotechnological challenges[J]. Foods, 2021, 10(2): 316. DOI:10.3390/foods10020316.

[5]

GAN R Y, SHAH N P, WANG M F, et al. Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 fermentation differentially affects antioxidant capacity and polyphenol content in mung bean (Vigna radiata) and soya bean (Glycine max) milks[J]. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 2017, 41(1): e12944. DOI:10.1111/jfpp.12944.

[7]

SKYLAS D J, BLANCHARD C L, QUAIL K J. Variation in nutritional composition of Australian mungbean varieties[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2017, 9(5): 45. DOI:10.5539/jas.v9n5p45.

[13]

LI H J, ZHANG L L, JIA Y Y, et al. Application of whey protein emulsion gel microparticles as fat replacers in low-fat yogurt: applicability of vegetable oil as the oil phase[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2022, 105(12): 9404-9416. DOI:10.3168/jds.2022-22314.

[14]

QIN Y, WANG M, JIANG H N, et al. Divergence in physicochemical and microstructural properties of set-type yogurt derived from bean proteins and animal milks: an inquiry into substitution viability[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2024, 193: 115689. DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2023.115689.

[15]

HAN Y P, FU M, ZHAO X H. The quality of set-style yoghurt responsible to partial lactose hydrolysis followed by protein crosslinking of the skimmed milk[J]. International Journal of Dairy Technology, 2015, 68(3): 427-433. DOI:10.1111/1471-0307.12195.

[17]

KASPRZAK M M, SADY M, KRUK J, et al. Replacement of milk fat by rapeseed oil stabilised emulsion in commercial yogurt[J]. PeerJ, 2023, 11: e16441. DOI:10.7717/peerj.16441.

[18]

JIAO B, WU B C, FU W M, et al. Effect of roasting and high-pressure homogenization on texture, rheology, and microstructure of walnut yogurt[J]. Food Chemistry: X, 2023, 20: 101017. DOI:10.1016/j.fochx.2023.101017.

[19]

DAMIN M R, ALCÂNTARA M R, NUNES A P, et al. Effects of milk supplementation with skim milk powder, whey protein concentrate and sodium caseinate on acidification kinetics, rheological properties and structure of nonfat stirred yogurt[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2009, 42(10): 1744-1750. DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2009.03.019.

[22]

AZARIKIA F, ABBASI S. Mechanism of soluble complex formation of milk proteins with native gums (tragacanth and Persian gum)[J]. Food Hydrocolloids, 2016, 59: 35-44. DOI:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.10.018.

[23]

CHANG C H, KONG B H, ZHAO X H. Quality attributes of the setstyle yoghurt from whole bovine milk as affected by an enzymatic oxidative cross-linking[J]. CyTA-Journal of Food, 2014, 12(3): 249-255. DOI:10.1080/19476337.2013.837963.

[24]

YANG M, LI N N, TONG L T, et al. Comparison of physicochemical properties and volatile flavor compounds of pea protein and mung bean protein-based yogurt[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2021, 152: 112390. DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112390.

[25]

MASIÁ C, KESHANIDOKHT S, PREISLER L D, et al. Plant lipid sources in fermented pea protein gels: emulsion stability and gel microstructure[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2023, 182: 114890. DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2023.114890.

[26]

MUDGIL P, JUMAH B, AHMAD M, et al. Rheological, microstructural and sensorial properties of camel milk yogurt as influenced by gelatin[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2018, 98: 646-653. DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2018.09.008.

[28]

TASPINAR T, GÜVEN M, AĞÇAM E. Bioactivity, volatile profile, and physicochemical properties of set-type yogurt enriched with European cranberrybush (Viburnum opulus L.) juice during storage[J]. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 2022, 46(1): e16212. DOI:10.1111/jfpp.16212.

[29]

WANG Y, GUO M Y, REN F Z, et al. A novel strategy to construct stable fat globules with all major milk fat globule membrane proteins to mimic breast milk fat emulsions at the protein level[J]. Food Research International, 2023, 173: 113351. DOI:10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113351.

[30]

SHRESTHA S, VAN ‘T HAG L, HARITOS V, et al. Comparative study on molecular and higher-order structures of legume seed protein isolates: lentil, mungbean and yellow pea[J]. Food Chemistry, 2023, 411: 135464. DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135464.

[31]

MERCAN E, SERT D, KARAKAVUK E, et al. Effect of different levels of grapeseed (Vitis vinifera) oil addition on physicochemical, microbiological and sensory properties of set-type yoghurt[J]. International Journal of Dairy Technology, 2017, 71: 34-43. DOI:10.1111/1471-0307.12415.

Food Science
Pages 106-113
Cite this article:
LIU J, ZHU T, XING L, et al. Effects of Mung Bean Varieties on Textural Characteristics and Sensory Quality of Fermented Mung Bean Milk. Food Science, 2025, 46(5): 106-113. https://doi.org/10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20240715-153

118

Views

3

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 15 July 2024
Published: 15 March 2025
© Beijing Academy of Food Sciences 2025.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return