AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home Food Science Article
PDF (2.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Analysis and Evaluation of Fruit Quality and Volatile Composition of F1 Hybrids between ‘Yuluxiang’ and ‘Shinseiki’ Pear

Yu YUE1 , Ping HUANG1, Hu CHEN2, Chunliang YU3, Jianying PENG1 ( )
College of Horticulture, Hebei Agricultural University, Hebei Pear Engineering Technology Research Center, Baoding 071000, China
College of Food Science and Technology, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071000, China
Wei County Forest and Fruit Development Service Center, Agriculture and Rural Bureau, Xingtai 054700, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

In order to explore the genetic variation between hybrid fruits and their parents and conduct comprehensive evaluation of hybrid fruits, seven promising F1 hybrids (7-93, 8-44, 8-176, 9-188, 9-193, 10-101 and 10-173) between ‘Yuluxiang’ and ‘Shinseiki’ pears, the female parent ‘Yuluxiang’ and the popular cultivar ‘Akizuki’ were evaluated for quality indicators such as single fruit mass, fruit shape index, hardness, soluble solid content, soluble sugar content, titratable acid content, sugar/acid ratio, vitamin C content, and aroma composition. Meanwhile, the differences in aroma among different cultivars were evaluated using orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA). The results showed that there was a significant difference in fruit quality among the seven F1 hybrids, with 8-44 having a fruit shape index equal to 1 and the highest soluble solids and sugar content. Altogether, 83 volatile components were detected from the nine cultivars, of which 10-173 and 8-44 had the highest total amount of volatile components, and 10-173 and 10-101 contained the highest number of volatile compounds. The major aroma components in pears were alcohols, esters, and aldehydes. The OPLS-DA results showed that the aroma components of 10-101 and 10-173 were significantly different from those of the other strains. Fruit quality traits of 10-101 had a significantly positive correlation with ethyl acetate and hexyl acetate; fruit quality traits of 10-173 had a significantly positive correlation with ethyl octanoate and α-farnesene and trans-2-hexenal, and their contents were significantly higher than those in the other strains, making the flavor more prominent. According to variable importance in the projection (VIP) results, we predicted 42 aroma markers that differed among varieties, and through odor activity value (OAV) analysis, we identified key volatile compounds that contributed to the characteristic odor of each strain. Through correlation analysis, we identified the association between pear quality traits and characteristic aromas. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that the comprehensive scores of 8-44, 10-173 and 10-101 had the highest ranking, indicating that they had better fruit quality than the other strains. In summary, 8-44, 10-101, and 10-173 can be regarded as potential pear strains. This study can provide a reference for the breeding and promotion of new pear varieties.

CLC number: S661.2 Document code: A Article ID: 1002-6630(2023)24-0277-09

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Food Science
Pages 277-285

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
YUE Y, HUANG P, CHEN H, et al. Analysis and Evaluation of Fruit Quality and Volatile Composition of F1 Hybrids between ‘Yuluxiang’ and ‘Shinseiki’ Pear. Food Science, 2023, 44(24): 277-285. https://doi.org/10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20230324-239

460

Views

2

Downloads

0

Crossref

2

Scopus

3

CSCD

Received: 24 March 2023
Published: 25 December 2023
© Beijing Academy of Food Sciences 2023.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).