AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home Food Science Article
PDF (3.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Effects of Biodynamic Vineyard Management on Yeast Community and Aroma Components in ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ Wine

Xuelian CHEN , Wei ZANG, Yu LIU, Zhanzhan JIANG, Shuai PENG ( ), Jing WANG ( )
Gansu Key Lab of Viticulture and Enology, College of Food Science and Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

In order to explore the effects of biodynamic vineyard management on the yeast community structure and volatile aroma components during wine fermentation, Cabernet Sauvignon grapes from biodynamic (BD) and conventional (CV) vineyards were naturally fermented, and the composition and succession of yeast community and aroma components were analyzed during the fermentation process, and the correlation between yeast communities and aroma components was analyzed by redundant analysis (RDA). The results showed significant differences in the yeast community composition between the BD and CV samples at different fermentation stages. At the early stage, Hanseniaspora uvarum, Starmerella bacillaris, Pichia kudriavzevii, Issatchen kiaorientalis and Cryptococus flavescens were the dominant species in BD, while H. uvarum, Metschnikowia pulcherrima and C. flavescens were the dominant species in CV. As the fermentation proceeded, the yeast species in BD and CV increased to 9 and 7 at the middle stage, respectively. H. uvarum was the dominant yeast in both samples. The non-Saccharomyces species decreased at the later and final stages of fermentation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae gradually became the dominant species, but Hanseniaspora opuntiae and S. bacillaris were found in CV but not BD at the end of fermentation. During the alcoholic fermentation process, the total content of aroma compounds was significantly higher in BD than in CV. Meanwhile, at all stages of fermentation, the contents of alcohols, aldehydes, and terpenes were higher in BD than in CV. However, the content of esters was lower in BD than in CV. RDA analysis showed that S. cerevisiae was positively correlated with the contents of all characteristic aroma components except benzaldehyde, and non-Saccharomyces yeasts (H. opuntiae, P. kudriavzevii, etc.) were positively correlated with the contents of 1-hexanol, benzaldehyde and ethyl acetate. In summary, this study provides data support for understanding the influence of different vineyard managements on the microbial diversity of vineyard and the aroma quality of grape and wine.

CLC number: TS262.2 Document code: A Article ID: 1002-6630(2023)20-0136-10

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Food Science
Pages 136-145

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
CHEN X, ZANG W, LIU Y, et al. Effects of Biodynamic Vineyard Management on Yeast Community and Aroma Components in ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ Wine. Food Science, 2023, 44(20): 136-145. https://doi.org/10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20221024-244

526

Views

1

Downloads

0

Crossref

3

Scopus

6

CSCD

Received: 24 October 2022
Published: 25 October 2023
© Beijing Academy of Food Sciences 2023.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).