AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home Food Science Article
PDF (2.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Effects of Three Peeling Methods on the Quality of White Pepper

Xin LI1,2 , Fuqing WANG3, Guiping WU2,4,5, Mengya DUAN2,6, Fenglin GU2,4,5,7 ( )
College of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Spice and Beverage Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Wanning 571533, China
National Joint Engineering Research Center for Intensive Processing of Special Agricultural and Animal Products in Tibetan Plateau, Lasa 850600, China
National Center of Important Tropical Crops Engineering and Technology Research, Wanning 571533, China
Key Laboratory of Processing Suitability and Quality Control of the Special Tropical Crops of Hainan Province, Wanning 571533, China
School of Ecological Technology and Engineering, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai 201418, China
The Innovation Platform for Academinicians Zhang Fusuo of Hainan Province, Wanning 571533, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

In this study, the effects of three peeling methods: mechanical peeling, soaking in still water and soaking in flowing water on physical and chemical indicators of white pepper such as whiteness value, black fruit percentage, broken fruit percentage, bulk density, moisture content, piperine content, and essential oil content were investigated. The composition and content of volatile compounds in the essential oils of white pepper were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed by gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-TOF-MS). The quality of peeled white pepper was evaluated by weighted analysis. Our results showed that there was no significant difference in the whiteness value between mechanically peeled white pepper and that peeled by flowing water soaking, but their whiteness values were higher than that of white pepper peeled by still water soaking. Mechanical peeling resulted in lower black fruit percentage and piperine content, but higher essential oil content, broken fruit percentage and bulk density compared with water soaking. A total of 33 volatile compounds were identified from the essential oils obtained by the three peeling methods, 21 compounds of which were common to all the oils, the predominant ones being 3-carene (41.96, 37.77 and 39.16 mg/mL, respectively), β-caryophyllene (36.43, 41.57 and 41.02 mg/mL, respectively), and limonene (29.38, 23.38 and 39.38 mg/mL, respectively). The electronic nose data showed that the flavor of the three white pepper samples was significantly different. The sensory evaluation showed that mechanically peeled white pepper had a stronger aroma and no odor. Furthermore, the weighted score of mechanically peeled white pepper was higher than that of white pepper peeled by water soaking. Therefore, the comprehensive quality of mechanically peeled white pepper is good, and it is suitable for large-scale production. The experimental results can provide a theoretical basis for pepper quality evaluation and industrial production.

CLC number: TS202.3 Document code: A Article ID: 1002-6630(2022)15-0079-08

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Food Science
Pages 79-86

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
LI X, WANG F, WU G, et al. Effects of Three Peeling Methods on the Quality of White Pepper. Food Science, 2022, 43(15): 79-86. https://doi.org/10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20220120-204

537

Views

3

Downloads

0

Crossref

2

Scopus

2

CSCD

Received: 20 January 2022
Published: 15 August 2022
© Beijing Academy of Food Sciences 2022.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).