AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home Food Science Article
PDF (2.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Basic Research | Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Effects of Different Freezing Methods on Water State and Quality Characteristics of Non-fermented Dough

Yong YANG1,2 Shuaishuai ZHENG1,3Zhilu AI1,2,3 ( )Zhili PAN1,2,3Zhen LI1,2,3
College of Food Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
National R & D Center for Frozen Rice & Wheat Products Processing Technology, Zhengzhou 450002, China
Key Laboratory of Staple Grain Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhengzhou 450002, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Considering the different applications of freezing methods (commonly used in households, traditional industrial production, and research laboratories), three freezing methods were selected to freeze non-fermented dough, namely cryogenic refrigerator freezing (RF), spiral tunnel freezing (SF) and liquid nitrogen spray freezing (LF). This study compared the effects of the freezing methods on the various characteristics of non-fermented dough, including water state, texture characteristics, rheological characteristics and microstructure. The results showed that there were significant differences in the freezing rates of the three different freezing methods, showing a decreasing order of LF (1.33 ℃/min) > SF (0.31 ℃/min) > RF (0.08 ℃/min). Furthermore, with the decrease in freezing rate, the water loss rate after dough freezing showed an upward trend, the proportion of A21 (peak area of strongly bound water) and A22 (peak area of weakly bound water) showed a downward trend, and the texture quality and rheological properties of the thawed dough deteriorated. In particular, we observed an increase in hardness. The microstructural observation showed that as the freezing rate slowed down, the pores in dough became larger and the structural compactness became poorer. In conclusion, the quality of the thawed dough treated by LF was the closest to that of fresh dough, followed by SF and RF. Therefore, LF, an emerging technology to be developed, is superior to SF, while RF is not conducive to maintaining the quality of flour-based foods.

CLC number: TS201.1 Document code: A Article ID: 1002-6630(2022)05-0011-06

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Food Science
Pages 11-16

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
YANG Y, ZHENG S, AI Z, et al. Effects of Different Freezing Methods on Water State and Quality Characteristics of Non-fermented Dough. Food Science, 2022, 43(5): 11-16. https://doi.org/10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20210915-182

394

Views

4

Downloads

0

Crossref

9

Scopus

7

CSCD

Received: 15 September 2021
Published: 15 March 2022
© Beijing Academy of Food Sciences 2022.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).