AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home Food Science Article
PDF (2.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Basic Research | Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Comparison of Antioxidant Activity in Vitro of Antioxidants Used in Heat-Processed Meat Products and Their Effects on Oxidation

Mingyang LI1 Shuaiguang LIU1Mengjiao LU1Xiaopu REN1 ( )Zengqi PENG2
Xinjiang Production & Construction Group Key Laboratory of Special Agricultural Products Further Processing in Southern Xinjiang, College of Food Science and Engineering, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China
College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

In order to clarify the relationships between the antioxidant activity in vitro of different antioxidants permitted to be added in heat-processed meat products according to the national standard of China GB 2760-2014 and their inhibitory effect on protein and fat oxidation, the 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging capacity and reducing power of eight selected antioxidants were determined, and the effect of separately adding the antioxidants to heat-processed meat products was investigated on protein and lipid oxidation as reflected by thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) value as well as the contents of carbonyl and sulfhydryl groups. The results showed that the total polyphenol content, DPPH radical scavenging capacity and reducing power of rosmarinci acid (RA), tea polyphenol (TP), theaflavins (TF) and carnosicacid (CA) were all significantly higher than those of glycyrrhiza extract (GE), extract of bamboo leaves (BL), sodium phytate (SP) and potassium sorbate (PS). For roasted and fried meat patties, there were large differences in the inhibitory effect of different antioxidants against protein and fat oxidation. BL was the most effective antioxidant suitable for all six processed meat products, TF was more suitable for roasted chicken patties and beef patties, TP was more suitable for roasted beef patties and pork patties, SP was more suitable for fried chicken patties and beef patties, and CA was more suitable for fried beef patties and pork patties. Overall, the antioxidants with strong antioxidant activity in vitro (RA, TP, TF, and CA) may not necessarily strongly inhibit protein and fat oxidation in heat-processed meat products, while the antioxidants with weak antioxidant activity in vitro can have strong inhibitory activity (BL and SP). This implies that there may not be a significant correlation between the antioxidant activity in vitro of different antioxidants and their ability to improve the oxidative stability of heat-processed meat products.

CLC number: TS251.1 Document code: A Article ID: 1002-6630(2022)01-0067-09

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Food Science
Pages 67-75

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
LI M, LIU S, LU M, et al. Comparison of Antioxidant Activity in Vitro of Antioxidants Used in Heat-Processed Meat Products and Their Effects on Oxidation. Food Science, 2022, 43(1): 67-75. https://doi.org/10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20201224-278

573

Views

2

Downloads

0

Crossref

5

Scopus

5

CSCD

Received: 24 December 2020
Published: 15 January 2022
© Beijing Academy of Food Sciences 2022.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).