AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Effects of Different Catching Methods on the Quality of White-Feathered Broilers

Mingcheng ZHANG1 Guangqiang CHANG1Miao FENG1Xiaomin DENG2Die WAN2Hui LIU1Duoduo ZHENG1Na JIA1Hongyu LI3Dengyong LIU1 ( )
National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Storage, Processing and Safety Control Technology of Fresh Agricultural Products, College of Food Science and Engineering, Bohai University, Jinzhou 121013, China
Shenyang Huamei Food Co. Ltd., Shenyang 110131, China
Beijing Ershang Meat Food Group Co. Ltd., Beijing 101100, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

In order to study the effect of catching methods on the quality of white-feathered broilers, 1200 forty-two-dayold white-feathered broilers, reared under the same conditions, were randomly divided into four groups, which were caught by the leg, breast, wing and neck, respectively. Premortem stress responses, body temperature, bruising rate, mortality rate, catching rate and postmortem meat quality were measured. The results showed that stress responses and mortality rate were significantly higher in the neck catching group than in the other groups (P < 0.05). Body temperature was significantly higher in the four treatment groups than in the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in catching rate between the breast catching group and the leg and neck catching groups (P > 0.05), but catching rate was significantly higher in these groups than in the wing catching group (P < 0.05). pH24 h of chicken breast meat was significantly higher in the breast and leg catching groups than in the wing and neck catching groups (P < 0.05), and water-holding capacity of chicken breast meat was significantly higher in the breast catching group than in the other treatment groups (P < 0.05). In conclusion, breast catching can reduce stress responses in broilers during the catching process, which is conducive to improving meat quality and reducing injuries, thus improving the edible value and market competitiveness of broiler products.

CLC number: TS251.4 Document code: A Article ID: 1001-8123(2024)08-0056-07

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Meat Research
Pages 56-62

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
ZHANG M, CHANG G, FENG M, et al. Effects of Different Catching Methods on the Quality of White-Feathered Broilers. Meat Research, 2024, 38(8): 56-62. https://doi.org/10.7506/rlyj1001-8123-20240605-136

376

Views

4

Downloads

0

Crossref

Received: 05 June 2024
Published: 31 August 2024
© China Meat Research Center 2024.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).