AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Clinical Research | Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Post-discharge fortified human milk feeding in preterm infants with moderate-to-high nutritional risk: a retrospective cohort study

Yun-He WANG, Yi YAO, Yun-Qian CHI, Zi-Han ZHANG, Yi-Yang LIU, Feng-Xin YI, Peng-Yuan WANG, Wei HAO( )
Department of Pediatrics, First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan 250014, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the effects of post-discharge fortified human milk feeding on growth, common complications, and neuropsychological development in preterm infants with moderate-to-high nutritional risk.

Methods

Clinical data were retrospectively collected from 320 preterm infants with moderate-to-high nutritional risk who were discharged from the Department of Neonatology, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University between January 2021 and December 2023 and completed a 6-month follow-up. Infants were classified into four groups by nutritional risk level and feeding method: moderate-risk fortified human milk, moderate-risk formula, high-risk fortified human milk, and high-risk formula. Comparisons were conducted between fortified human milk and formula within the same risk level, and between moderate- and high-risk groups within the same feeding method.

Results

Within the same feeding method, gestational age at birth and birth weight differed significantly between moderate- and high-risk infants (P < 0.001). Within the same nutritional risk level, no significant differences were found between fortified human milk and formula groups in gestational age at birth and birth weight (P>0.05). In the fortified human milk groups, corrected gestational age at discharge differed significantly between moderate- and high-risk infants (P < 0.05). No significant differences were noted among the four groups in discharge weight, length, or head circumference (P>0.05). Analysis of covariance, adjusting for discharge weight, length, head circumference, and corrected gestational age at discharge, showed no significant differences among the four groups during the 6-month follow-up in growth velocities of weight, length, or head circumference, nor in hemoglobin, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, or alkaline phosphatase measured at 1, 3, and 5 months (P>0.05). Multivariable logistic regression indicated that fortified human milk feeding did not increase the risk of infection (OR=0.66, 95%CI: 0.40-1.08, P=0.097) or feeding intolerance (OR=0.70, 95%CI: 0.45-1.08, P=0.107). At 6 months' corrected age, mental, motor, and behavioral scores did not differ significantly among groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

In preterm infants at moderate-to-high nutritional risk, postdischarge fortified human milk feeding does not increase the risk of infection or feeding intolerance, does not differ significantly from formula feeding in short-term catch-up growth or neuropsychological development, and appears clinically feasible and safe.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics
Pages 1218-1225

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
WANG Y-H, YAO Y, CHI Y-Q, et al. Post-discharge fortified human milk feeding in preterm infants with moderate-to-high nutritional risk: a retrospective cohort study. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, 2026, 28(10): 1218-1225. https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2508012

3

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 01 August 2025
Revised: 07 September 2025
Accepted: 07 May 2026
Published: 15 October 2026
© Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics.

OA under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license