AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Article | Open Access

Entropy of Metal/Solution Interfaces: Thermodynamic Framework, Theoretical Models, and Roles of Interfacial Water

Zeng-Ming Zhanga,b,#Zi-Xi Lianga,c,#Jun Huanga,b ( )
Institute of Energy Technologies, IET-3: Theory and Computation of Energy Materials, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, Germany
Faculty of Georesources and Materials Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen 52062, Germany
Institute for a Sustainable Hydrogen Economy, INW-1, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, Germany

#Contributed equally to this work as the co-first authors.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Entropy is a basic thermodynamic property of the electrical double layer (EDL) at metal/solution interfaces, yet, its definition, measurement, and theoretical treatment are dispersed in the literature, and, in some cases, ambiguous. In this paper, we revisit the thermodynamic theory of EDL, from which two variants of entropy, excess entropy and formation entropy, are obtained and compared. In terms of the formation entropy, two calculation routes are validated in the context of a primitive EDL model, namely, the Gouy-Chapman (GC) model. After clarifying the concepts and calculation routes, we investigate interfacial water effects on the EDL entropy, using a refined Gouy-Chapman-Stern (GCS) model accounting for chemical potential difference between oxygen- and hydrogen-down water molecules, denoted δµ. The model-derived differential capacitance and entropy are compared with experimental data for the EDL at Au(111) in an aqueous electrolyte solution. The model reveals that the charge of maximum entropy (CME) is negative when water molecules have higher tendency to take oxygen-down configuration at the uncharged surface. Moreover, the formation entropy profile becomes asymmetric around the CME, when δµ is potential-dependent. However, the model fails to simultaneously reproduce capacitance and entropy measurements on the same system taken from two separate studies, indicating deficiencies of the model or experimental errors. Nevertheless, this work stresses the importance of measuring both capacitance and entropy of EDLs at the same time.

Graphical Abstract

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
dhx-32-3-2515010_ESM.pdf (12.9 MB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Electrochemistry

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Zhang Z-M, Liang Z-X, Huang J. Entropy of Metal/Solution Interfaces: Thermodynamic Framework, Theoretical Models, and Roles of Interfacial Water. Journal of Electrochemistry, 2026, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.61558/2993-074X.3601

4

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 13 November 2025
Revised: 10 December 2025
Accepted: 24 December 2025
Published: 24 December 2025
© 2026 Xiamen University and Chinese Chemical Society.

This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).