AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (10.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Generic meta-transfer learning model with special neuronal processing parameters for few-shot fault bearing diagnosis

Peiqi WANGa,bChangqing SHENa,b( )Bojian CHENa,bJuanjuan SHIa,bWeiguo HUANGa,bZhongkui ZHUa,b
School of Rail Transportation, Soochow University, Suzhou 215131, China
Intelligent Urban Rail Engineering Research Center of Jiangsu Province, Suzhou 215131, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of JAMST

Show Author Information

Abstract

The society is now in the data-rich environment, and deep learning is widely used in bearing fault diagnostic technology due to the advancement of information technology. These methods typically need a large amount of data to support. However, in some practical cases, only few of samples are frequently available when a fault occurs rather than adequate data to be analyzed. This situation indicates that bearing fault diagnostic problems are frequently few-shot problems. In this work, a generic meta-transfer learning model with special neuronal processing parameters (MSNPP) is proposed. MSNPP avoids the issue of overfitting commonly encountered in traditional meta-learning approaches when solving few-shot problems and maintains excellent performance when extracting features with deep networks. Moreover, MSNPP discovers the connection between different tasks by analyzing a few samples and quickly adapts to new tasks. In MSNPP, a technique known as neuron transfer (NT) is used to manipulate neurons by scaling and shifting them. The scaling and shifting parameters are used as meta-learning hyperparameters to transfer within different tasks, which is the work of NT. Experimental result shows that MSNPP prevents the issue of overfitting in conventional meta-learning approaches and achieves satisfactory accuracy and robustness when solving few-shot problems in fault diagnosis.

References

1

Liu D, Shi J, Liao ZR, et al. Prognostics and health management for electromechanical system: A review. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Science and Technology 2022; 2(4): 2022015.

2

Zhou T, Hu MH, He Y, et al. Vibration features of rotor unbalance and rub-impact compound fault. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Science and Technology 2022; 2(1): 2022002.

3

Hou JJ, Ma B, Liang LB, et al. An early warning method for mechanical fault detection based on adversarial auto-encoders. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Science and Technology 2022; 2(2): 2022006.

4

Yang B, Lei YG, Li X, et al. Deep targeted transfer learning along designable adaptation trajectory for fault diagnosis across different machines. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 2023; 70(9): 9463-9473.

5

Shi HT, Shang YJ. Initial fault diagnosis of rolling bearing based on second-order cyclic autocorrelation and DCAE combined with transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2021; 71: 1-18.

6

Zhang XY, Chen G, Hao TF, et al. Rolling bearing fault convolutional neural network diagnosis method based on casing signal. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 2020; 34(6): 2307-2316.

7

Manjit K, Dilbag S. Fusion of medical images using deep belief networks. Cluster Computing 2020; 23: 1439-1453.

8
Li SM, Xin Y, Li XQ, et al. A review on the signal processing methods of rotating machinery fault diagnosis. 2019 IEEE 8th Joint International Information Technology and Artificial Intelligence Conference (ITAIC); 2019 May 24-26; Chongqing, China; 2019. p. 1559-1565.
9

Zhao Z, Li TF, Wu JY, et al. Deep learning algorithms for rotating machinery intelligent diagnosis: An open source benchmark study. ISA Trans 2020; 107: 224-255.

10
Vinyals O, Blundell C, Lillicrap T, et al. Matching networks for one shot learning. NIPS 2016: Neural Information Processing Systems 29; 2016 Dec 5-10; Barcelona, Spain; 2016. p. 29.
11

Chen ZY, Wang YH, Wu, J, et al. Wide residual relation networkbased intelligent fault diagnosis of rotating machines with small samples. Sensors 2022; 22(11): 4161.

12
Finn C, Abbeel P, Levine S. Model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of deep networks. PMLR 2017: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning; 2017 Jul 7-10; Amsterdam, Netherlands; 2017. p. 1126-1135.
13

Fu QM, Wang ZC, Fang NG, et al. MAML2: meta reinforcement learning via meta-learning for task categories. Frontiers of Computer Science 2023; 17: 174325.

14

Feng Y, Chen JL, Xie JS, et al. Meta-learning as a promising approach for few-shot cross-domain fault diagnosis: Algorithms, applications, and prospects. Knowledge-Based Systems 2022; 235: 107646.

15

Wang YQ, Yao QM, Kwok JT, et al. Generalizing from a Few Examples: A Survey on Few-shot Learning. ACM Computing Surveys 2021; 53(3): 1-34.

16

Wang D, Zhang M, Xu YC, et al. Metric-based meta-learning model for few-shot fault diagnosis under multiple limited data conditions. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2021; 155: 107510.

17

Zhang TC, Chen JL, Li FD, et al. Intelligent fault diagnosis of machines with small & imbalanced data: A state-of-the-art review and possible extensions. ISA Transactions 2022; 119: 152-171.

18
Sun QR, Liu YY, Chua TS, et al. Meta-transfer learning for few-shot learning. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; 2019 Jun 15-20; Longbeach, CA, USA; 2019. p. 403-412.
19

Wu JY, Zhao ZB, Sun C, et al. Few-shot transfer learning for intelligent fault diagnosis of machine. Measurement 2020; 166: 108202.

20

Feng Y, Chen JL, Zhang TC, et al. Semi-supervised meta-learning networks with squeeze-and-excitation attention for few-shot fault diagnosis. ISA Transactions 2022; 120: 383-401.

21

Chen JJ, Hu WH, Cao D, et al. A Meta-learning method for electric machine bearing fault diagnosis under varying working conditions with limited data. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 2023; 19(3): 2552-2564.

22

Hu XJ, Ding XX, Bai DP. A compressed model-agnostic meta-learning model based on pruning for disease diagnosis. Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers 2022; 32(2): 2350022.

23

Li CAJ, Li SB, Zhang AS, et al. Meta-learning for few-shot bearing fault diagnosis under complex working conditions. Neurocomputing 2021; 439: 197-211.

Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Science and Technology
Cite this article:
WANG P, SHEN C, CHEN B, et al. Generic meta-transfer learning model with special neuronal processing parameters for few-shot fault bearing diagnosis. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2023, 3(3): 2023007. https://doi.org/10.51393/j.jamst.2023007

204

Views

2

Downloads

2

Crossref

5

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 05 April 2023
Revised: 27 April 2023
Accepted: 19 May 2023
Published: 15 July 2023
© 2023 JAMST

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0),which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Return