AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

In Vivo Genotoxicity of Gold Nanorods in Mouse Bone Marrow Compared with Cyclophosphamide

Amira M. Gamal-Eldeen1,2( ), Mona A.M. Abo-Zeid2,3( ), Sherien M. El-Daly1,4, Mahmoud T. Abo-Elfadl1,2, Cinderella A. Fahmy1,2, Moustafa R.K. Ali5,6, Mostafa A. El-Sayed6
Biochemistry Department, National Research Centre (NRC), Dokki 12622, Cairo, Egypt
Cancer Biology and Genetics Laboratory, Center of Excellence for Advanced Sciences, NRC
Genetics and Cytology Department, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt
Department of Medical Biochemistry, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt
Advanced Material Sciences and Nanotechnology Laboratory, Centre of Excellence for Advanced Sciences, NRC, Cairo, Egypt
Laser Dynamics Laboratory, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0400, USA
Show Author Information

Abstract

Gold nanorods (GNRs) are now under extensive investigation for biomedical applications. The in vivo genotoxic profile GNRs are not elucidated yet, therefore we investigated it in comparison with one of the most effective chemotherapeutic agents, cyclophosphamide (CP), in a mice model. PEGylated-GNRs (50 nm) were injected to Balb/C mice triple times, while CP-treated mice were treated once and the bone marrow cells (BMCs) were collected after 21 days. Chromosome aberrations, mitotic index, sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs), replicative index, micronucleus (MN) and DNA damage using comet assay were investigated. GNRs induced chromosome aberrations including- and excluding-gaps significantly at p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively, however CP resulted in a higher significant increase in both types with p < 0.001. The percentage of SCEs / cell was not affected by GNRs treatment, while it was extremely significant with CP. Both mitotic activity and proliferative index were reduced dramatically with both of GNRs and CP. The recorded MN were lower in GNRs- than CP-treated mice. The percentage DNA damage, tail length and tail moment were higher in CP than GNRs. In conclusion, CP induced extreme genotoxicity more than GNRs. Both of GNRs and CP induced DNA damage. The study indicated the advantage of lower GNRs genotoxicity than that of CP. After 21 days, one injection of CP led to extreme persistent genotoxic effect more than that of multiple injections of GNRs.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Nano Biomedicine and Engineering
Pages 306-314

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Gamal-Eldeen AM, Abo-Zeid MA, El-Daly SM, et al. In Vivo Genotoxicity of Gold Nanorods in Mouse Bone Marrow Compared with Cyclophosphamide. Nano Biomedicine and Engineering, 2016, 8(4): 306-314. https://doi.org/10.5101/nbe.v8i4.p306-314

1163

Views

37

Downloads

3

Crossref

6

Scopus

Received: 14 December 2016
Accepted: 27 December 2016
Published: 29 December 2016
© 2016 Amira M. Gamal-Eldeen, Mona A.M. Abo-Zeid, Sherien M. El-Daly, Mahmoud T. Abo-Elfadl, Cinderella A. Fahmy, Moustafa R. K. Ali, and Mostafa A. El-Sayed.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.