AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.9 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article | Open Access

Assessment of CO2-energized fracturing methods: Their impacts on fracturing fluid flowback and CO2 geological storage in deep tight gas reservoirs

School of Petroleum Engineering, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an 710065, P. R. China
Engineering Research Center of Development and Management for Low to Ultra-Low Permeability Oil & Gas Reservoirs in West China, Ministry of Education, Xi’an 710065, P. R. China
Sulige South Operation Branch, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi’an 710018, P. R. China
National Engineering Laboratory for Exploration and Development of Low-Permeability Oil & Gas Fields, Xi’an 710018, P. R. China
Oil and Gas Technology Institute of Changqing Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Xi’an 710018, P. R. China
School of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 1H9, Canada
Show Author Information

Abstract

CO2-energized fracturing holds great potential for enhancing fracturing fluid flowback and enabling effective CO2 sequestration, while the effect of the choice of CO2 energization strategy on these processes is not yet fully understood. This study experimentally investigated three representative CO2 energization methods: Pre-fracturing injection, foam injection, and co-injection. Nuclear magnetic resonance techniques were applied to systematically analyze the influence of various CO2 injection parameters on fracturing fluid flowback behavior and CO2 storage in tight formations. The results showed that CO2 pre-fracturing increases displacement pressure and significantly improves flowback efficiency, with optimal performance achieved at a moderate injection volume. Reducing the injection rate and increasing the volume further enhanced the CO2 storage ratio. Foam injection facilitated flowback by improving foam quality, particularly in macropores. Co-injection achieved a favorable balance between high flowback efficiency and substantial CO2 retention. Furthermore, the three energization strategies were shown to lead to distinct fluid redistribution patterns within porous media: Pre-fracturing promoted CO2 retention in micropores and mesopores, foam injection reduced retention in macropores, and co-injection provided the most balanced performance in mesopores. These findings provide new insights into CO2-energized fracturing and sequestration mechanisms and offer technical guidance for optimizing CO2-based stimulation strategies in deep unconventional tight gas reservoirs.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Advances in Geo-Energy Research
Pages 58-71

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Luo K, Gao H, Xie Y, et al. Assessment of CO2-energized fracturing methods: Their impacts on fracturing fluid flowback and CO2 geological storage in deep tight gas reservoirs. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2026, 19(1): 58-71. https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2026.01.05

553

Views

31

Downloads

1

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 11 November 2025
Revised: 13 December 2025
Accepted: 01 January 2026
Published: 03 January 2026
© The Author(s) 2026.

This article is distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.