AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article | Open Access

Reactive transport modeling of water-CO2-rock interactions in clay-coated sandstones and implications for CO2 storage

Hubei Key Laboratory of Complex Shale Oil and Gas Geology and Development in Southern China, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, P. R. China
National Key Laboratory of Deep Oil and Gas, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, P. R. China
Xinjiang Research Institute of Huairou Laboratory, Urumqi 830000, P. R. China
Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Palaj, Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382355, India
WH Bryan Mining & Geology Research Centre, Sustainable Minerals Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia
Show Author Information

Abstract

In this work, the potential influences of grain-coating clays on water-CO2-rock interactions in sandstones and subsequent ramifications for CO2 storage were investigated using reactive transport simulations. The results indicated that, compared to pore-filling smectite, grain-coating smectite leads to significant pH decrease, increases in the CO2-species concentrations, and decreases in smectite dissolution and the precipitation of secondary minerals. Moreover, it was revealed that smectite and chlorite coats dissolve preferentially over detrital K-feldspar being covered, while K-feldspar is dissolved preferentially over illite and kaolinite coats. While the mineral trapping mechanism is only important for smectite and chlorite coats, sandstone porosity is significantly reduced for chlorite coat but increased for the other three clay coats. The main causes of the differences between pore-filling and grain-coating scenarios for smectite and chlorite coats are ascribed to the inhibitory effect of clay coats on the growth of secondary quartz and the dissolution of clay. In addition to the above two factors, the decelerating effect of clay coats on the dissolution of K-feldspar is also important for illite coat; meanwhile, for the kaolinite coat, the dissolution of clay is less important and the other two factors are more critical. Furthermore, the coverage and thickness of clay coats, fluid flow rate, detrital grain size, detrital lithology, partial pressure of CO2, and temperature may all impact the role of clay coats.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
ager-17-2-121_ESM.pdf (5.9 MB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Advances in Geo-Energy Research
Pages 121-134

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Li H, Hu Q, Zhu R, et al. Reactive transport modeling of water-CO2-rock interactions in clay-coated sandstones and implications for CO2 storage. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2025, 17(2): 121-134. https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2025.08.04

605

Views

46

Downloads

4

Crossref

2

Web of Science

3

Scopus

Received: 17 June 2025
Revised: 11 July 2025
Accepted: 29 July 2025
Published: 02 August 2025
© The Author(s) 2025.

This article is distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.