AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article | Open Access

Combination of non-ionic and cationic surfactants in generating stable CO2 foam for enhanced oil recovery and carbon storage

Deysarkar Centre of Excellence in Petroleum Engineering, IIT Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721302, India
Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen 7800, Norway
Show Author Information

Abstract

Surfactant-stabilized CO2 foam is a promising technology to reduce CO2 mobility in geologic CO2 storage and CO2 enhanced oil recovery processes. In this study, various combinations of a non-ionic surfactant, Alkyl polyglycoside, along with cationic surfactants were ingeniously examined to enhance carbon storage and facilitate oil recovery through CO2-based foam flooding. Specifically, for the first time, the investigation focused on the impact of altering the alkyl chain length and counter-ion type of the cationic surfactants. The surfactant combinations were first screened based on surfactant characterization, surface and interfacial tension studies and bulk foam experiments. The interfacial tension studies showed that, in combination with Alkyl polyglycosides, the C16 (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide and cetyltrimethylammonium chloride) alkyl chain length cationic surfactants exhibited less interfacial tension values than the C12 (dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide and dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride) alkyl chain length cationic surfactant. The bulk foam experiments established that Alkyl polyglycosides/C16 combination showed higher foamability and foam stability than Alkyl polyglycosides/C12 combination. The bulk foam investigation showed that the optimized concentration of Alkyl polyglycosides/cationic-surfactant was 0.3/0.15 wt%. The surfactant combinations screened from these studies were evaluated for EOR coreflooding experiments at 1250 psi and 60 ℃. The incremental oil recovery obtained for baseline CO2 and Alkyl polyglycosides/cetyltrimethylammonium bromide foam flooding was 18.5% and 32.7%, respectively. The estimated carbon storage potential for baseline CO2 g and Alkyl polyglycosides/cetyltrimethylammonium bromide foam flooding was 11.9% and 23.7%, respectively. The combination of Alkyl polyglycosides cetyltrimethylammonium bromide surfactant was demonstrated as an effective solution for increased oil recovery and carbon storage.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
ager-13-1-42_ESM.docx (154.2 KB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Advances in Geo-Energy Research
Pages 42-55

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Tripathi R, Alcorn ZP, Graue A, et al. Combination of non-ionic and cationic surfactants in generating stable CO2 foam for enhanced oil recovery and carbon storage. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2024, 13(1): 42-55. https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2024.07.06

1619

Views

120

Downloads

10

Crossref

9

Web of Science

12

Scopus

Received: 06 April 2024
Revised: 03 May 2024
Accepted: 05 June 2024
Published: 10 June 2024
© The Author(s) 2024.

This article is distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.