AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (4.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Variation patterns and dual correction method of overburden pressure porosity and permeability in glutenite reservoirs of the BZ area

Qiangyong GAO1Cairui SHAO2( )Zhiheng ZHAO2,3( )Ruihong WANG1Fuming ZHANG2Sainan XU1Xinlei SHI1
Tianjin Branch of CNOOC China Limited, Tianjin 300459, China
School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China
Zhundong Oil Production Management Aera, PetroChina Tuha Oilfield Company, Hami 839009, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

To address the challenges of poor sorting, strong heterogeneity, and unclear overburden pressure-dependent variations in porosity and permeability in glutenite reservoirs, where existing conventional sandstone correction methods are inadequate, this study investigates the Paleogene Kongdian Formation glutenite reservoirs (burial depth: 3800~4100 m) in the BZ area. Using overburden pressure porosity-permeability experiments and rock mechanics test data from 13 core plugs covering the main porosity-permeability range, we reveal the unique variation patterns and establish a targeted correction model. The results show that this is a low-porosity, ultra-low-permeability reservoir, with matrix porosity of 5%~15% and permeability of 0.1~6 mD under ambient conditions. The pore space is dominated by intergranular and intragranular dissolution pores, with occasional microfractures, indicating significant heterogeneity. Unlike conventional sandstone reservoirs, the porosity and permeability of these glutenite reservoirs decrease following a power-law function with increasing overburden pressure. The decline gradient varies with the initial porosity and permeability at ambient pressure. Thus, the overburden pressure-dependent porosity/permeability is a bivariate function of the overburden pressure and its initial value at ambient conditions. By fitting the experimental data, we derived the quantitative relationship between the power-law coefficients and the ambient-pressure porosity/permeability, constructing a triaxial overburden pressure correction model. Incorporating rock mechanics data, a uniaxial overburden pressure bivariate correction model for in-situ conditions was also established. Accuracy verification shows that the triaxial model achieves an MSE of 0.369% for porosity and 0.281 mD for permeability. Compared to the traditional univariate model, accuracy improves by 67% and 43%, respectively, providing reliable characterization across both high and low porosity-permeability ranges. The proposed bivariate correction method fills a gap in overburden pressure porosity-permeability correction for glutenite reservoirs and solves the problem that traditional methods cannot adequately account for their strong heterogeneity. This method provides an essential correction tool for accurate reserve evaluation and productivity prediction, and offers a theoretical basis for designing efficient development strategies.

CLC number: P618.13; TE135

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Petroleum Science Bulletin
Pages 41-53

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
GAO Q, SHAO C, ZHAO Z, et al. Variation patterns and dual correction method of overburden pressure porosity and permeability in glutenite reservoirs of the BZ area. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2026, 11(1): 41-53. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2096-1693.2026.01.004

5

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Received: 05 September 2025
Revised: 11 December 2025
Published: 01 February 2026
© 2026 Petroleum Science Bulletin