AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Design of the wall thickness of a certain large diameter natural gas pipeline using a reliability method

Yanfei CHEN1( )Chunsha WANG1Shaohua DONG2Fuheng HOU1Xingtao LI3
School of Mechanical and Storage Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China
Pipeline Technology and Safety Research Center, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China
China National Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Company Ltd., Beijing 100029, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

The scale of onshore natural gas pipelines in China is huge, and the pipeline routes have complex and diverse terrain, landforms, and climate characteristics. Faced with the complexity of pipelines and the environment in which they operate, improving the intrinsic safety level of oil and gas pipelines is a common demand of the industry and the public. Ensuring the safe and reliable operation of onshore natural gas pipelines has become an increasingly important focus of industry attention. To achieve this goal, it is possible to improve the design method of onshore natural gas pipelines from the source. At present, traditional stress based design methods are widely used in natural gas pipeline design. Due to the use of a single safety factor, it is difficult to consider the safety margin of oil and gas pipelines. To address this issue, Reliability Based Design and Assessment (RBDA) is becoming a trend in modern onshore natural gas pipeline design. This method can quantify the risks throughout the entire life cycle of the pipeline and avoid using unreasonable or overly conservative design standards. Therefore, this study integrates the reliability design method of the CSA Z662 "Oil and Gas Pipeline System" standard specification for oil and gas pipelines, and combines it with the reliability research revised by some domestic institutions according to China's national conditions. Using the RBDA method process, the main causes of pipeline failure (mainly corrosion and third-party damage) are determined based on a certain section of actual natural gas pipeline. The limit state of the pipeline is designed during its life cycle, and the corresponding limit state equation type is selected based on the limit state. Multiple data statistical analysis methods and software are used to determine the distribution types of various random variable parameters involved in the equation. Then, the Monte Carlo method is used to calculate the failure probability of the natural gas pipeline under the design wall thickness condition, and the weights of other failure causes are considered comprehensively to obtain the natural gas pipeline failure probability. The reliability of the pipeline, Compare the reliability data with the target reliability determined by domestic and foreign standard specifications to verify whether it meets the reliability target.Thus, the wall thickness design of the large-diameter natural gas pipeline section was completed, realizing the overall process of using RBDA method for the design of 1016mm large-diameter natural gas pipelines.

CLC number: TE832;TE973

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Petroleum Science Bulletin
Pages 831-840

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
CHEN Y, WANG C, DONG S, et al. Design of the wall thickness of a certain large diameter natural gas pipeline using a reliability method. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2024, 9(5): 831-840. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2096-1693.2024.05.064

1131

Views

37

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Received: 13 September 2022
Revised: 09 May 2023
Published: 01 October 2024
© 2024 Petroleum Science Bulletin