AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (799.6 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Laboratory toxicity of three insecticides and effects to physiological biochemistry of Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley

Jia-Li ZHANG1,2, Jiang-Mei QIN2, Wu QIN2, Yu-Sha WANG3, Xiao-Yan CAI2, Shao-Bin LI1( ), Hong-Song CHEN2( )
College of Life Science, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434000, Hubei Province, China
Plant Protection Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Guangxi Key Laboratory of Biology for Crop Diseases and Insect Pests/Key Laboratory of Green Prevention and Control on Fruits and Vegetables in South China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanning 530007, China
College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Aim

Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley is an important invasive pest, whose control mainly depends on chemical insecticides. This study aimed to select highly effective insecticides for the control of P. solenopsis and to clarify their effects on its physiological biochemistry.

Methods

Three different chemical types of insecticides (acetamiprid, beta-cypermethrin and methomyl), which are effective in controlling sucking mouthparts, were selected and analyzed the toxicity of these insecticides against third-instar nymphs of P. solenopsis with the leaf-dipping method under laboratory conditions. Moreover, we assessed the detoxification enzymes activity [glutathione-S-transferases (GSTs) and carboxylesterase (CarE)], and the energy substances content (soluble proteins, triglycerides and trehalose) of P. solenopsis at LC50, LC30 and LC10.

Results

The results showed that acetamiprid had the lowest median lethal concentration (22.97 mg/L). The activity of GSTs was significantly increased when exposed to LC50 of all three insecticides. However, the activity of CarE was inhibited by beta-cypermethrin and methomyl stresses. The lowest activity of CarE was observed in methomyl LC30 treatment (48.14 U/g). The contents of trehalose of P. solenopsis were significantly decreased in all the concentrations when exposed to the three candidates. The lowest content of trehalose was observed in acetamiprid LC30 treatment (16.60 mg/g). However, soluble protein content was significantly decreased only in the exposure of beta-cypermethrin and methomyl. At the same lethal concentration, the soluble protein content after acetamiprid treatment was significantly higher than that of beta-cypermethrin and methomyl treatment. The triglyceride content in P. solenopsis was significantly increased only under methomyl LC10 stress (31.11 mg/g) and significantly decreased under beta-cypermethrin LC50 treatment (11.93 mg/g).

Conclusion

It indicated that P. solenopsis was more sensitive to acetamiprid and consumed a large amount of energy to survive when exposed to insecticides, and GSTs may play an important role in the detoxification process of P. solenopsis. Our results provide a theoretical basis for the rational selection of insecticides and the study of resistance mechanism in the integrated pest management of P. solenopsis.

CLC number: Q968.1 Document code: A Article ID: 1674-0858(2026)02-0608-09

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Environmental Entomology
Pages 608-616

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
ZHANG J-L, QIN J-M, QIN W, et al. Laboratory toxicity of three insecticides and effects to physiological biochemistry of Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2026, 48(2): 608-616. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-0858.2026.02.29

1

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 30 July 2024
Revised: 08 October 2024
Accepted: 09 October 2024
Published: 05 March 2026
© 2026 Editorial Board of Journal of Environmental Entomology

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).