AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (5.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Trapping efficacy of different lures and traps against Maruca vitrata and other arthropods

Li-Min CHEN1,2, Tian-Jun HE1, Da-Yun ZHOU1, Qian-Qian WU3, Jin-Ming ZHANG2, Hai-Xia ZHANG2, Yao-Bin LÜ2( ), Quan-Cong WU1( )
Lishui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lishui 323000, Zhejiang Province, China
Institute of Plant Protection and Microbiology, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China
Qingyuan County Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Areas, Qingyuan 323800, Zhejiang Province, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

The capture efficacy of Maruca vitrata is significantly influenced by sex pheromone lures, sugar-acetic acid-ethanol-water solution (SAEW) and traps of different shapes. To develop environmentally friendly and efficient traps for M. vitrata and evaluate the feasibility of combining sex pheromone with SAEW, we compared the trapping performance of three attractant treatments across different trap designs in bean fields in capturing adult M. vitrata and other arthropods, including natural enemies: 1) sex pheromone lure (7 trap types), 2) SAEW (4 trap types), and 3) combination of sex pheromones and SAEW (4 trap types). Results demonstrated that triangular-, bucket-, and ship-shaped traps baited with sex pheromone, as well as bucket-shaped traps baited with the pheromone-SAEW combination, achieved significantly higher M. vitrata adults capture rates than other trap-attractant combinations. Regarding the trapping effects on other arthropods, traps using only sex pheromone were relatively safe for beneficial arthropods (natural enemies and bees). The triangular and ship-shaped traps also exhibited some trapping effect on pests from the Thripidae family. However, SAEW-baited double-basin, basin, and bottle traps caused considerable harm to beneficial insects like natural enemies and bees. Bucket traps baited with either SAEW alone or the pheromone-SAEW combination also captured significant numbers of lepidopteran and coleopteran pests.

CLC number: Q968.1 Document code: A Article ID: 1674-0858(2025)05-1679-10

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Environmental Entomology
Pages 1679-1688

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
CHEN L-M, HE T-J, ZHOU D-Y, et al. Trapping efficacy of different lures and traps against Maruca vitrata and other arthropods. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2025, 47(5): 1679-1688. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-0858.2025.05.32

1

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 30 April 2024
Revised: 22 January 2025
Accepted: 23 January 2025
Published: 05 September 2025
© 2025 Editorial Board of Journal of Environmental Entomology

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).