Research on the Subjective Risks and Avoidance of Generative Artificial Intelligence Education——An Analysis Based on Generative Philosophy

At present, generative artificial intelligence represented by ChatGPT, has set off a new wave of future education reform. However, the current research on artificial intelligence education has not been located in the “generative” “linguistic undertones”, which makes it impossible to truly explain the underlying causes of the risk of subjective dissolution. While generative philosophy provides a new perspective to analyze the subjectivity of generative artificial intelligence education from the perspectives of subject participation and value choice. From the perspective of generative philosophy, the “generation” of generative artificial intelligence is a kind of “advanced reproduction”, not the “creation” of human beings, and the ambiguity of understanding on the two kinds of “generation” led human beings into a enslaved state dominated and controlled by technologies, resulting in the potential risk of the elimination of subjectivity of human beings This potential risk was manifested as the high belief of human beings in instrumental rationality, the difficulty in discriminating the truth and falsity of generated content, the same property of education strengthened by technical quantitative calculus, and the amplification of moral defects of human beings. To avoid the hidden risks hidden by technologies, it was necessary to change the materialistic tendency of the education process, take the “human being” in education as the core, balance the purpose view of instrumental rationality and value rationality, combine the knowledge view of dialectical criticism and wisdom creation, coordinate the result-oriented and process-oriented ability view, and and take into account the values of algorithm and human beings, so as to discover and reshape the “human beings” who are disciplined by technology in generative artificial intelligence education.