AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Comparison and Prospect of Alternative Refrigerants for MAC Based on New PFASs Restriction Regulation Proposal

Zhaolong RenYan GuanXiang YinYulong SongFeng Cao( )
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi′an Jiaotong University, Xi′an, 710049, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

With the adoption and implementation of the Kigali Amendment in China, the R134a refrigerant has gradually reduced and could be eliminated in China′s mobile air conditioning (MAC). Currently, the most important alternative refrigerants for MAC are R1234yf, CO2, and R290; however, China has no criteria for the selection of these three refrigerants. Recently, Germany and five other countries have proposed regulations to restrict PFASs, and R1234yf has also been included in the restricted list; therefore, the prospect of R1234yf is not optimistic. In this context, this study compares R1234yf, CO2, and R290 in terms of environmental protection, safety, economy, and system performance. Relevant research results and conclusions are summarized, and the latest PFAS substance restriction proposal involving MAC was organized and analyzed. These efforts provide direction for the research of alternative refrigerants in the field of MAC in China, which may be used as a basis for the selection of alternative refrigerants for MAC in the future.

CLC number: TB61+2;U463.85+1 Document code: A Article ID: 0253-4339(2024)04-0001-13

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Refrigeration
Pages 1-13

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Ren Z, Guan Y, Yin X, et al. Comparison and Prospect of Alternative Refrigerants for MAC Based on New PFASs Restriction Regulation Proposal. Journal of Refrigeration, 2024, 45(4): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0253-4339.2024.04.001

6

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

CSCD

Received: 12 May 2023
Revised: 05 September 2023
Accepted: 07 October 2023
Published: 16 August 2024
© 2024 The Editorial Office of Journal of Refrigeration

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).