AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home BLASTING Article
PDF (9.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Preparation of Dust Suppressant for Water Bags in Tunnel Blasting and its Application in Similarity Simulation

Qing-biao WANG1,2,3, Shou-zhi BAO1, Cun-wen WANG4, Guang-peng QIN1,3, Zhen-yue SHI1,3,4( ), Yong SUN1,3, Ke-yong WANG1,3, Cheng-lin TIAN1,3, Zhong-lei LIU5, Tong-jiang LIU5, Fu-bao GENG6
Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China
National Engineering Laboratory of Coal Mine Fill Mining, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Tai′an 271019, China
Rock Burst Prevention and Control Technology and Equipment Laboratory, Shandong Energy Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250200, China
China Railway 14th Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250101, China
Shandong Huazhong Testing and Appraisal Co., Ltd., Jinan 250100, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

To address dust pollution challenges in tunnel drilling and blasting operations, this study developed an eco-friendly high-efficiency water bag dust suppressant. The innovation significantly enhances the wetting and agglomeration capabilities of water bags, thereby optimizing dust control performance in hydrostatic blasting applications. Guided by safety and environmental protection principles, three surfactants (OB-2, APG1214, and 1631) and their critical micelle concentrations (CMC) were determined through surface tension measurements. Subsequently, three composite dust suppressants (S-1, S-2, and S-3) were formulated using binary combination methodology. Their dust-suppression efficacy was systematically assessed using surface-tension analysis and contact-angle measurements. A 1:10-scale tunnel-blasting model was developed based on geometric similarity principles derived from plateau tunnel conditions. Furthermore, controlled experiments compared three configurations: no water bag placement, placement of ordinary water bags, and placement of dust suppressant water bags. A real-time dust concentration monitoring system quantified particulate concentration variations across the three experimental configurations. Results demonstrated superior performance by the dust suppressant S-1 (OB-2/APG1214 composite), exhibiting an optimal surface tension of 29.19 mN/m and wettability (27.7° contact angle). In scaled simulations, scenario Ⅲ (suppressant-treated water bags) achieved a sectional dust concentration of 12.22 mg/m3 at t=21 s, representing reductions of 79.89% and 60.32% relative to scenarios Ⅰ (no treatment) and Ⅱ (conventional water bags), validating exceptional particulate control efficacy.

CLC number: TU94 Document code: A Article ID: 1001-487X(2026)03-0295-10

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
BLASTING
Pages 295-304

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
WANG Q-b, BAO S-z, WANG C-w, et al. Preparation of Dust Suppressant for Water Bags in Tunnel Blasting and its Application in Similarity Simulation. BLASTING, 2026, 43(3): 295-304. https://doi.org/10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2026.03.030

4

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Received: 31 October 2025
Published: 15 September 2026
© 2026 Blasting Magazine Editorial Office

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).