AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home BLASTING Article
PDF (12.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Measurement of Overbreak and Underbreak Thickness and Optimization of Perimeter Hole Blasting Parameters in Roadways

Yong-hua QIN1, Lin-qing CHENG1, An-ping HUANG2, Wen-feng SHAO1, Cong CHEN1, Hua-geng LU1, Yuan-hao LI2, Pin WANG1,2,3( )
Guangxi Fozi Mining Co., Ltd., Wuzhou 543100, China
School of Resources, Environment and Materials, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
School of Safety and Resources Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

In tunnel blasting operations, inappropriate peripheral-hole design parameters frequently lead to overbreak and underbreak phenomena, adversely affecting excavation efficiency and jeopardizing the structural integrity of surrounding rock formations. Using a tunnel project at the Guangxi Fozi Lead-Zinc Mine as the case study, this research initially employed a handheld 3D laser scanner to acquire excavation-face geometric data, with multiple tunnel sections selected for overbreak and underbreak quantification. Subsequently, an LS-DYNA numerical model was developed to simulate the contour blasting excavation process with high fidelity. Critical parameters including hole spacing, explosive charge per blasthole, and smooth blasting layer thickness were systematically optimized. Comprehensive qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed to evaluate damage zones across various tunnel sections. Field validation of the optimized design was conducted, incorporating the coefficient of determination R2 to quantitatively assess excavation face smoothness and its engineering significance. The results demonstrate that: (1)The numerical model effectively captures the damage progression in surrounding rock mass under blasting loads, revealing significant overbreak primarily in the charged sections and underbreak near the blasthole collar and bottom under current blasting parameters; (2)Excessive hole spacing and charge quantity substantially increase average overbreak thickness, while smooth blasting layer thickness(40~60 cm range) exhibits comparatively minor influence; (3)Implementing decked charging structure instead of continuous charging with optimized parameters(60 cm spacing, 1.5 kg per hole, 40 cm smooth blasting layer) reduces maximum overbreak depth from 38.5 cm to 27.4 cm, decreases maximum underbreak depth from 44.5 cm to 20.9 cm, and improves tunnel contour matching coefficient from 0.339 to 0.841. The optimized blasting parameters successfully mitigated overbreak and underbreak in surrounding rock mass while significantly improving the contour smoothness of the tunnel excavation faces.

CLC number: TD235.3 Document code: A Article ID: 1001-487X(2026)03-0100-12

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
BLASTING
Pages 100-111

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
QIN Y-h, CHENG L-q, HUANG A-p, et al. Measurement of Overbreak and Underbreak Thickness and Optimization of Perimeter Hole Blasting Parameters in Roadways. BLASTING, 2026, 43(3): 100-111. https://doi.org/10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2026.03.010

7

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Received: 17 November 2025
Published: 20 January 2026
© 2026 Blasting Magazine Editorial Office

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).