AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (312.9 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

A new block censoring scheme: comparative assessment of likelihood and spacings methods for Weibull distribution with an application to cancer data

Mazen Nassar1,2( )Refah Alotaibi3
Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
Department of Statistics, Faculty of Commerce, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
Department of Mathematical Sciences, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
Show Author Information

Abstract

In reliability experiments conducted across multiple groups, prolonged test durations and heterogeneity among groups can substantially reduce efficiency and affect statistical inference. This study has proposed a new censoring design that combines block experimentation with an improved adaptive progressive Type-Ⅱ hybrid termination rule to ensure controlled test duration while maintaining sufficient failure information. The proposed framework generalizes several existing censoring schemes and allows independent groups to operate under flexible stopping conditions. Assuming Weibull lifetimes with a common shape parameter and group-specific scale parameters, parameter estimation and reliability characteristics were obtained using maximum likelihood and maximum product of spacings methods. Both point and interval estimators were developed. To quantify heterogeneity across groups, a new measure based on confidence interval overlap, called the coverage similarity index, was introduced. Simulation results showed that the maximum product of spacings method generally provides more accurate estimation for scale-related quantities and reliability measures, while maximum likelihood performs slightly better for the shape parameter and mean time to failure. The proposed methodology was illustrated using cancer survival data from ovary, breast, and kidney groups, where meaningful heterogeneity was detected. The findings confirm the practical value of the proposed design and highlight the importance of accounting for group-level variation in reliability and survival analysis.

CLC number: 62F10, 62F15, 62N01, 62N05

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
AIMS Mathematics
Pages 6834-6865

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Nassar M, Alotaibi R. A new block censoring scheme: comparative assessment of likelihood and spacings methods for Weibull distribution with an application to cancer data. AIMS Mathematics, 2026, 11(3): 6834-6865. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2026282

4

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 29 January 2026
Revised: 01 March 2026
Accepted: 09 March 2026
Published: 15 March 2026
©2026 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)