AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

TOPSIS model with combination weight for demand assessment of flood emergency material supplies

Bingbing XuWenguang Yang( )Lanxiang YiDekun KongRuitian Liu
College of Science, North China Institute of Science and Technology, Beijing 101601, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Assessing the urgency of emergency material demand in disaster scenarios improves dispatching efficacy and enhances emergency management agencies' operational efficiency during post-disaster relief. Taking the July 20 flood in Henan, China, as a case study, this paper assesses the urgency of emergency material demand in flood disaster scenarios. The objective weights and subjective weights of the evaluation indicators are calculated using the coefficient of variation method and the order relation analysis method, respectively. Then this paper combines these calculated weights on the basis of maximizing deviation, and the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) method is used to judge the demand urgency of disaster sites. Finally, a cloud model is introduced to visualize the urgency evaluation results obtained from the single weighting method and the combination weighting method by generating cloud maps. The results demonstrate that the hyper-entropy value of the cloud digital features obtained by the combination weighting is 0.0432 (the smallest among the methods), indicating the least uncertainty and a relatively small degree of dispersion. At the same time, the condensation rate of cloud droplets in the cloud map generated by the combined weighting method is higher, indicating that the combined weighting method has lower uncertainty compared with the single weighting method and is superior to the single weighting method in efficiency. Moreover, through sensitivity analysis, it is evident that when the weight of the most important evaluation indicator varies within the range of [0.1192, 0.3881], the TOPSIS method based on combined weighting demonstrates strong robustness.

CLC number: 62P12, 62P25

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
AIMS Mathematics
Pages 5373-5398

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Xu B, Yang W, Yi L, et al. TOPSIS model with combination weight for demand assessment of flood emergency material supplies. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 5373-5398. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2025248

46

Views

1

Downloads

1

Crossref

1

Web of Science

3

Scopus

Received: 06 January 2025
Revised: 24 February 2025
Accepted: 27 February 2025
Published: 15 March 2025
©2025 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)