Discover the SciOpen Platform and Achieve Your Research Goals with Ease.
Search articles, authors, keywords, DOl and etc.
We introduce a deterministic, policy-targeted Bellman value-iteration framework for computing the optimal exercise boundary of perpetual American put options. Our method replaces path sampling in the Bellman operator with Gauss–Hermite quadrature and employs shape-preserving interpolation for off-grid evaluations, eliminating sampling noise and reducing computational cost. Under the Black–Scholes (BS) model, our approach recovers the analytic boundary with a mean absolute percentage error below 1.5% in approximately 19–56 seconds. The resulting policy values, evaluated via Monte Carlo simulation, deviate from the analytic benchmark by less than 0.07%. For the Heston model, where no closed-form solution exists, our method produces boundaries that differ from a high-resolution finite-difference benchmark by 1–5%. Despite these boundary deviations, the expected payoffs from the policies are remarkably close, with relative policy value gaps well below 0.2%. Notably, our method computes the boundary in about 127–180 seconds, a significant speedup compared to the 2,103–3,119 seconds required by the finite-difference method. This work presents a practical and robust alternative for optimal stopping problems, offering a compelling balance of speed and accuracy, particularly when partial differential equation (PDE) solvers are cumbersome or Monte Carlo simulation is prohibitively expensive.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
Comments on this article