AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Assessing the accuracy and efficiency of kinematic analysis tools for six-DOF industrial manipulators: The KUKA robot case study

Mohamed S. Elhadidy1,2( ), Waleed S. Abdalla1,2, Alaa A. Abdelrahman1, S. Elnaggar1, Mostafa Elhosseini3,4
Department of Mechanical Design and Production Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt
Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Horus University, New Damietta 34517, Egypt
College of Computer Science and Engineering, Taibah University, Yanbu 46421, Saudi Arabia
Computers and Control Systems Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
Show Author Information

Abstract

Accuracy is an important factor to consider when evaluating the performance of a manipulator. The accuracy of a manipulator is determined by its ability to accurately move and position objects in a precise manner. This research paper aims to evaluate the performance of different methods for the kinematic analysis of manipulators. The study employs four distinct techniques, namely mathematical modeling using the closed form solutions method, roboanalyzer, Peter Corke toolbox, and particle swarm optimization, to perform kinematic analysis for manipulators. The KUKA industrial manipulator is used as an illustrative case study in this research due to its widespread use in various industrial applications in addition to its high precision and stability. Its wide usage in the industry makes the results of this research highly relevant and allows for a thorough evaluation of the performance of the different methods being studied. Furthermore, understanding the kinematic analysis of the manipulator can also help in improving the performance and increasing the efficiency of the robot in different tasks. This paper conducts a comparison of the accuracy of the four methods, and the results indicate that particle swarm optimization is the most accurate method. The RoboAnalyzer approach achieved the fastest execution time.

CLC number: 68T40, 70B15, 93C85

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
AIMS Mathematics
Pages 13944-13979

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Elhadidy MS, Abdalla WS, Abdelrahman AA, et al. Assessing the accuracy and efficiency of kinematic analysis tools for six-DOF industrial manipulators: The KUKA robot case study. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 13944-13979. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2024678

1141

Views

67

Downloads

28

Crossref

20

Web of Science

31

Scopus

Received: 13 March 2024
Revised: 06 April 2024
Accepted: 09 April 2024
Published: 16 April 2024
©2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)