AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

The "never-proved" triangle inequality: A GeoGebra & CAS approach

Zoltán Kovács1Tomás Recio2( )Carlos Ueno3Róbert Vajda4,5
The Private University College of Education of the Diocese of Linz, Salesianumweg 3, 4020 Linz
Department of Industrial Engineering, Higher Polytechnical School, University Antonio de Nebrija, C. Santa Cruz de Marcenado 27, Madrid 28015, Spain
CEAD Prof. Félix Pérez Parrilla, C. Doctor García Castrillo, 22, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35005, Spain
School of Education, Johannes Kepler University, Linz 4040, Austria
Bolyai Institute, University of Szeged, Szeged 6723, Hungary
Show Author Information

Abstract

We use a quite simple, yet challenging, elementary geometry statement, the so-called "never proved" (by a mathematician) theorem, introduced by Prof. Jiawei Hong in his communication to the IEEE 1986 Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, to exemplify and analyze the current situation of achievements, ongoing improvements and limitations of GeoGebra's automated reasoning tools, as well as other computer algebra systems, in dealing with geometric inequalities. We present a large collection of facts describing the curious (and confusing) history behind the statement and its connection to automated deduction. An easy proof of the "never proved" theorem, relying on some previous (but not trivial) human work is included. Moreover, as part of our strategy to address this challenging result with automated tools, we formulate a large list of variants of the "never proved" statement (generalizations, special cases, etc.). Addressing such variants with GeoGebra Discovery, Maple , REDUCE/Redlog or Mathematica leads us to introduce and reflect on some new approaches (e.g., partial elimination of quantifiers, consideration of symmetries, relevance of discovery vs. proving, etc.) that could be relevant to consider for future improvements of automated reasoning in geometry algorithms. As a byproduct, we obtain an original result (to our knowledge) concerning the family of triangles inscribable in a given triangle.

CLC number: Primary 03B35; Secondary 14Q30, 51-08, 51M04, 51M16, 68V15

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
AIMS Mathematics
Pages 22593-22642

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Kovács Z, Recio T, Ueno C, et al. The "never-proved" triangle inequality: A GeoGebra & CAS approach. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 22593-22642. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20231151

636

Views

1

Downloads

3

Crossref

3

Web of Science

3

Scopus

Received: 24 March 2023
Revised: 17 June 2023
Accepted: 25 June 2023
Published: 15 October 2023
©2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)