AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Does FinTech drive asymmetric risk spillover in the traditional finance?

Huayu Sun1Fanqi Zou2Bin Mo3( )
Shenzhen Tourism College, Jinan University, Shenzhen 518053, China
School of Economics, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
Guangzhou Institute of International Finance, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

The rapid development of fintech has caused a great impact on traditional financial industries. It improves the quality of financial services but also buries potential risks at the same time. This paper takes China's FinTech and traditional financial industry as the research objects based on the daily yield data from 2019 to 2022. First, we measure the systemic risk index ∆CoVaR (Conditional Value at Risk) of the FinTech industry and traditional financial industries after effectively fitting the marginal distribution of industry return data. Second, we decompose the systemic risk sequences of FinTech and traditional financial industries to obtain the data at different frequencies with the combination of the frequency decomposition method. Finally, we use the quantile-on-quantile regression model to analyze the risk spillover effect of the FinTech industry driving traditional financial industries in different frequencies under different risk states. The article draws the following conclusion: first, in general, the peak of the positive risk spillover impact of FinTech on the traditional industries is mainly concentrated in the high quantile of FinTech, while the peak of the negative impact is mainly concentrated in the low quantile of FinTech. Second, the risk spillover impact direction of FinTech on the five traditional financial industries mainly changes from negative to positive under high trading frequency and low trading frequency, and takes a U-shape in medium trading frequency.

CLC number: 03, 91

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
AIMS Mathematics
Pages 20850-20872

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Sun H, Zou F, Mo B. Does FinTech drive asymmetric risk spillover in the traditional finance?. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(12): 20850-20872. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20221143

47

Views

1

Downloads

5

Crossref

4

Web of Science

4

Scopus

Received: 09 September 2022
Revised: 20 October 2022
Accepted: 27 October 2022
Published: 15 December 2022
©2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)