AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Ductile fracture toughness of Al 5754-H111 alloy using essential work of fracture method

Mohammed Y. Abdellah1,2( )Nouby M. Ghazaly1Al-Shimaa H. Kamal1Abo-El Hagag A. Seleem3G. T. Abdel-Jaber1,4
Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, South Valley University, Qena, 83523, Egypt
Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering and Islamic Architecture, Umm Al-Qura University Makkah, KSA
Sun Miser Petroleum Company, Egypt
New Assiut university of Technology (NATU), Assiut, Egypt
Show Author Information

Abstract

The aluminium alloy 5754 H-111 is a high-strength alloy with a remarkable corrosion resistance, particularly to seawater. It is widely used in the aerospace, marine, and automotive industries. In this work, the influence of fracture toughness methods applied to two thin aluminium sheets with different thicknesses (1.8 mm and 5 mm) was analysed. The first method was the essential work of fracture (EWF) method. It was applied at room temperature at a deformation rate of 1 mm/min with a double-edge notched tensile specimen (DENT) to measure the fracture toughness ( w e ) of a material with ductile damage based on the stored energy of the body. The second method was a compact tensile test (CT) to determine the linear elastic fracture toughness. For the EWF, DENTs of 4, 6, 10, 12, and 14 mm were used in the centre section. The EWF values were 273 kJ/m2 and 63 kJ/m2 for the aluminium sheets with thicknesses of 5 mm and 1.8 mm, respectively. The surface energies JIC determined using CT were 34.5 kJ/m2 and 10.6 kJ/m2, respectively, for these sheets. These values are highly similar. Furthermore, the percentage errors of the elastic EWF were 5.8% and 8.4%, respectively, for the two thicknesses. The fractures were of the stress types in which the pits and voids grow in conjunction. In addition, both deep and isolated large dimples were well distributed in the aluminium, which is the main ductile deformation concept.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
AIMS Materials Science
Pages 370-389

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Abdellah MY, Ghazaly NM, Kamal A-SH, et al. Ductile fracture toughness of Al 5754-H111 alloy using essential work of fracture method. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(2): 370-389. https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2023020

5

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

9

Web of Science

9

Scopus

Received: 22 December 2022
Revised: 25 March 2023
Accepted: 03 April 2023
Published: 15 April 2023
©2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)