AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (4.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Use of Norwegian National Test Sites to evaluate CPTU correlations embedded in software

Tom Lunne1( )Luisa Dhimitri2John Powell3Santiago Quinteros1
Offshore Geotechnics, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, P.O. Box 3930, Oslo N-0806, Norway
Geotech Engineer, UK
Geolabs Limited, Bucknalls Lane, Garston, Watford, WD25 9XX, UK
Show Author Information

Abstract

Commercial software packages that utilise published CPTU correlations are frequently used for quick presentation of soil parameters such as soil unit weight, over consolidation ratio, undrained shear strength, lateral stress ratio, and peak friction angle. It is a well-known fact that such correlations are not globally valid, but many practitioners use the parameters obtained this way even in foundation design. At the Norwegian soft clay, quick clay, silt, and sand sites, high quality sampling and laboratory testing have resulted in a consistent representative database of reliable soil parameters. Moreover, high quality results of CPTU, seismic cones, self-boring pressuremeter and a novel flow cone tool are also available at the sites. Using these high-quality benchmark parameters gives an excellent opportunity to evaluate the validity of the soil parameters derived from 18 published CPTU correlations used in commercial software packages. For transparency, the correlations are described in some detail with full reference to the source. A comparison of correlation derived parameters and reliable laboratory-based benchmark soil parameters showed that the use of global correlations can be too conservative and, in some cases, dangerous. Local correlations are not only recommended but are essential for design. In this study, we did not cover highly overconsolidated clays and very dense sands, though similar conclusions on those soils may be expected.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
AIMS Geosciences
Pages 753-789

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Lunne T, Dhimitri L, Powell J, et al. Use of Norwegian National Test Sites to evaluate CPTU correlations embedded in software. AIMS Geosciences, 2025, 11(3): 753-789. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2025032

3

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

Received: 28 February 2025
Revised: 14 July 2025
Accepted: 28 July 2025
Published: 15 September 2025
©2025 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)