AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Assessment of groundwater potential zones and mapping using GIS/RS techniques and analytic hierarchy process: A case study on saline soil area, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand

Watcharin PhoemphonBantita Terakulsatit( )
School of Geotechnology, Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
Show Author Information

Abstract

The research purpose is to assess and delineate groundwater potential zones (GWPZs) in the saline soil area in the districts of Non-Thai, Non-Sung, Non-Daeng, Khong, and Kham Sakae Saeng, Nakhon Ratchasima province, Thailand, using remote sensing (RS), geographical information system (GIS), and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) techniques. The GWPZs were created by combining multiple influencing factors such as slope, landforms, annual rainfall, soil texture class, drainage density, geology, hydrogeological unit, land use/land cover, groundwater potential, and normalized difference vegetation index of the study area. The AHP technique was used to determine the weights of various thematic layers to identify the groundwater potential zone. The weights of the thematic layers in descending order consisted of hydrogeological unit (17.61%), geology (17.10%), groundwater potential (12.09%), soil texture class (12.09%), drainage density (8.55%), landforms (8.46%), land use/land cover (6.05%), slope (6.01%), annual rainfall (6.01%), and normalized difference vegetation index (6.01%), respectively. The acceptable consistency ratio (CR) is used to evaluate the reliability of AHP techniques, and which coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.7131 was used to validate the salinity data of 17 groundwater wells. The overall weightage of the AHP technique assessment was classified into 5 categories of the GWPZs including very high potential, high potential, moderate potential, poor potential, and very poor potential. The mostly groundwater quality distribution represented a moderate potential of about 1,101 km2 (46.01%) to a poor potential of about 1,114 km2 (46.57%) from the 2,390 km2 of the study area located throughout the study area especially Kham Sakae Saeng, Non-Thai, and Non-Sung districts.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
AIMS Geosciences
Pages 49-67

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Phoemphon W, Terakulsatit B. Assessment of groundwater potential zones and mapping using GIS/RS techniques and analytic hierarchy process: A case study on saline soil area, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand. AIMS Geosciences, 2023, 9(1): 49-67. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2023004

9

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

3

Web of Science

Received: 09 August 2022
Revised: 30 October 2022
Accepted: 16 November 2022
Published: 15 March 2023
©2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)