AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Landscape mapping using ground-penetrating radar, electrical resistivity tomography survey and landscape profiling

Victor M Matasov1,2,3Svetlana S Bricheva4,5,6( )Alexey A Bobachev7Iya V Mironenko2Anton V Fedin1,8Vladislav V Sysuev2Lyudmila A Zolotaya7Sergey B Roganov2
Department of Landscape Design and Sustainable Ecosystems, Agrarian-Technological Institute, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia—RUDN University, Moscow, Russia
Department of Physical Geography and Landscape Science, Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov MSU, Moscow, Russia
Faculty of Geography and Geoinformation Technology, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
Department of Seismic and Geoacoustic, Faculty of Geology, Lomonosov MSU, Moscow, Russia
Department of Quaternary paleogeography, Institute of Geography RAS, Moscow, Russia
Department of Geology and Geophysics NSU, Novosibirsk, Russia
Department of Geophysical Methods of Earth Crust Study, Faculty of Geology, Lomonosov MSU, Moscow, Russia
Laboratory of Geomorphology, Institute of Geography RAS, Moscow, Russia
Show Author Information

Abstract

This work aims to verify and correct the boundary between two landscapes—moraine and outwash plain—delineated earlier by the classical landscape approach. The initial interpretation of the boundary caused controversy due to the appearance of the thermokarst depression in the outwash landscape. The lithological structure is one of the main factors of landscape differentiation. The classical approach includes drilling to obtain the lithological and sedimentary data. However, the boreholes are usually shallow, while geophysical methods allow to look deeper into the subsurface and improve our knowledge about lithological structure and stratigraphy. In this study, we use ground-penetrating radar with a peak frequency of 250 and 50 MHz and detailed electrical resistivity tomography (with 1 m electrode spacing) in addition to the landscape mapping and drilling to correct the landscape boundary position. We conclude that it is primarily defined by the subsurface boundary between lithological complexes of clayish moraine deposits and sandy outwash deposits located at 7 m depth. Moving the boundary to the northeast by 70–100 m from the current position removes inconsistencies and clarifies the history of the area's formation in the Quaternary.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
AIMS Geosciences
Pages 213-223

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Matasov VM, Bricheva SS, Bobachev AA, et al. Landscape mapping using ground-penetrating radar, electrical resistivity tomography survey and landscape profiling. AIMS Geosciences, 2022, 8(2): 213-223. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2022012

2

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

Received: 04 December 2021
Revised: 12 January 2022
Accepted: 08 February 2022
Published: 15 June 2022
©2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)