AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home AIMS Energy Article
PDF (708.5 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Transitioning from coal to solar: A cost-benefit analysis for sustainable power generation in Indonesia

Agus Sugiyono1Irawan Rahardjo1Prima Trie Wijaya1Afri Dwijatmiko1( ) Aminuddin2,3Erwin Siregar1Silvy Rahmah Fithri1Nona Niode1Ira Fitriana1
Research Center for Energy Conversion and Conservation, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Science and Technology Park, South Tangerang City, Banten, Indonesia
Research Center for Process and Manufacturing Industry Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Science and Technology Park, South Tangerang City, Banten, Indonesia
Master of Industrial Engineering Program, Mercu Buana University, Jakarta
Show Author Information

Abstract

The greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions contribution from power generation in Indonesia reaches 40% of the total GHG emissions in the energy sector because of the use of fossil fuels. The government aims to minimize GHG emissions in the power generation sector, one of which is the phase-out of coal power plants and replacing them with integrated photovoltaic (PV) power plants with battery energy storage systems (BESS). A cost-benefit analysis compared two development scenarios for 2023–2060. The base scenario continues developing coal power plants, and the phase-out scenario replaces coal power plants with integrated PV power plants and BESS. The analysis is solely focused on the financial costs and benefits for power plant investors. The results indicate that the present value of costs for the base scenario from 2023–2036 is initially lower compared to the phase-out scenario. However, in the long term, the costs of the phase-out scenario will gradually decrease and become more affordable. The benefit-cost ratio for the phase-out scenario is 2.36, while the base scenario is 2.12, indicating that the phase-out scenario is more prospective for future development. Additionally, the phase-out scenario has the advantage of achieving the net-zero emissions target by 2056 compared to the base scenario.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
AIMS Energy
Pages 152-166

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Sugiyono A, Rahardjo I, Wijaya PT, et al. Transitioning from coal to solar: A cost-benefit analysis for sustainable power generation in Indonesia. AIMS Energy, 2024, 12(1): 152-166. https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2024007

389

Views

12

Downloads

8

Crossref

4

Web of Science

8

Scopus

Received: 29 October 2023
Revised: 26 December 2023
Accepted: 29 December 2023
Published: 09 January 2024
©2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)